From the Dark, Into the Dark: New Europe Meets old BRICS on the Way
Keywords:International ordering, representations, popular culture, European union, BRICS
AbstractIn 2012, the European Union (EU) received the Nobel Peace Prize amidst political and economic crises. Just before the nomination, the EU released (and withdrew) an advertisement on European enlargement. Rather than contemplating incumbent members, it presented EU’s alleged set of enemies - countries from the BRICS group, which benefited from the aforementioned crises. It portrays a gripping landscape in which the EU is the embodiment of rational, peaceful change whereas Brazil, India and China are rendered allegories of unfettered destruction. The juxtaposition between crises and the Nobel brings to the EU’s status in a shifting world to the table. Brazilian, Indian, Chinese stereotypes get mobilized to stabilize ongoing notions of European identity and polity. BRICS countries and the EU are set apart in moral terms. Through the advertisement, BRICS and the EU get positioned in an ongoing struggle for international ordering. Enjoying the opportunity of Nobel Prize to critically approach the EU as a political entity, the paper brings EU’s portrayal of others to the fore, focusing how historical claims are made to work, challenging EU’s concatenation of representations. The paper, inspired by a handful of International Relations critical contributions, problematizes such representations on grounds of how practices of making claims about history work through popular culture fixing roles for the EU and the BRICS in a shifting world order.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large - Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Aristotle. (350 B.C.E). Politics. Retrieved from: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.1.one.html. Access in: January 1st 2013.
Bartelson, J. (2007). Philosophy and History in the Study of Political Thought. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 1, 101-124.
Bartelson, J. (1998). Second Natures – Is The State Identical With Itself? European Journal of International Relations, 4(3), 295–326.
Bartelson, J. (2001). The critique of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.
Camargo, S. (2008). A União Européia: Uma Comunidade em Construção. Retrieved from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cint/v30n2/v30n2a06.pdf. Access in: January 1st 2012.
Darby, P. (1998). The Fiction of Imperialism: reading between International Relations and post-colonialism. London; Washington DC; Cassel.
Derrida, J. (1979). Scribble (Writing-Power). Yale French Studies, 58, 17-147.
Fanon, F. (1961). The wretched of the earth. London, Grove.
Foucault, M. (1982) The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.
Foucault, M. (1984). Politics and Ethics: An interview. In: RABINOW, P. The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon, 378-380.
Inayatullah, N. & Blaney, D. (2004). International relations and the problem of difference. New York, Routledge.
Jahn, B. (2000). The cultural construction of international relations. New York, Palgrave.
Koselleck, R. (1985). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Laffey, M. & Weldes, J. (1997). Beyond belief: From ideas to symbolic technologies. European Journal of International Relations, 3(2), 193-238.
Misztal, B. (2003). Theories of social remembering. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Muppidi, H. (2004). The politics of the global. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Neocleus, M. (2008). Critique of security. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Pocock, J.G.A. (2009). Political thought and history: Essays on theory and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rancière, J. (2001). Ten theses on politics. Retrieved from: http://www.ucd.ie/philosophy/staff/maevecooke/Ranciere.Ten.pdf. Access in: January 1st 2012.
Shapiro, M. J. (1989). Textualizing Global Politics. In: DER DERIAN, J. & SHAPIRO, M. J. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern readings of world politics. New York: Lexington Books, p. 11-22.
Shapiro, M. J. (2004). Methods and nations: cultural governance and the indigenous subject. New York: Routledge.
Shapiro, M. J. (2009). Cinematic Geopolitics. New York, Routledge.
Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/outside: International relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Cambridge Studies in International Relations).
Walker, R. B. J. (2006). The double outside of the modern international. ephemera - theory & politics in organization, 6(1),56-69. Retrieved from: http://www.ephemeraweb.org/. Access in: October 20th 2007.
Weber, C. (1994). 'Good girls, little girls, and bad girls: Male paranoia in robertkeohane's critique of feminist international relations' in millennium, Journal of International Studies 23, 337-349.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).