The role of Effective Supervision on academic performance of Senior High Schools in Ghana

Vera Rosemary Ankoma-Sey, Bashir Maina


In all facets of life, supervision has become a cross-cutting edge tool and a pivot around which performance revolves. There are widespread and on-going debates centred on the influence of effective supervision on academic performance in our academic institutions. This study examined the role of supervision on academic performance in Senior High Schools (SHS) in Ghana. The study was based on the collegial model of educational management and the supervision model, Theory Y as proposed by Douglas McGregor. This study employed the descriptive research survey design. Through a questionnaire, data analysed was collected from 963 respondents who were purposively selected from randomised schools in each region comprising of headmasters, their assistants and heads of department of 155 SHSs across Ghana. The WAEC results (2006-2009 and 2011) of the sampled schools were analysed. Reliability coefficient of the questionnaire was Cronbach’s alpha (α) = 0.826. The Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) version 18 software was employed in the analyses of data using, mean, standard deviation, correlation and independent t-test. The study revealed that there was a positive weak significant relationship between supervision roles of heads and academic performance of students. Moreso, there was a positive weak significant relationship between gender of heads and their supervision roles. The study recommended that supervision should be intensified in SHS. Heads of SHS should be re-orientated in the new trends of supervision in schools.


Academic performance, Educational management, Gender, Heads of SHS, Supervision

Full Text:



Aderounmu, W. O. & Ehiametalor, E. T. (1985). Introduction to Administration of Schools in Nigeria. Ibadan: Evans Brothers.

Ali, N., Jusoff, K., Ali, S., Mokhtar, N., and Salamt, A. S. A. (2009). ‘The Factors Influencing Students’ Performance at Universiti Teknologi MARA Kedah, Malaysia’. Canadian Research and Development Center of Sciences and Cultures, 3(4). [23 October 2012].

Bamroongraks, W . (1996) 'The role of the Thai inspectorate in the management, monitoring and supervision of the teachers' in: ACEID, op. cit., pp. 252-254.

Bays, D. A. (2001). Supervision of special education instruction in rural public school districts: A grounded theory. Doctoral Dissertation. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Bernard, J. M. & Goodyear, R. K. (2004). Fundamentals of Clinical Supervision. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Best, J. W., & Khan, J. V. (1998). Research in Education. (8th Ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Brennen, A. M. (2008). Clinical supervision and case study. Retrieved from http:/

Brinker Hoff, R.O. (1983). Program Evaluation: A Practioners Guide for Trainers and Educators, In: Stufflebeam, D.L.; Madaus, G.F. and Kellaghan, T. (1983). Evaluation Models, (Eds.), Chicago University Kluwer Academic Publisher Group, Pp. 33-83.

Burke, P. J., & Krey, R. D. (2005). Supervision: A guide to instructional leadership (2nd ed.). Illinois: Charles Thomas Publishers.

Cole, C. A. (1996). Management, Theory and Practice (5th ed.). London: DP Publications.

Duke, D.L. (1993). Removing Barriers to Professional Growth. Phi Delta Kappan 74(9):702.

Gebhard, J.G. (1990) Models of Supervision: Choices, Pp. 263-269. In: Richards, J.C. and Nunan, D. (Eds.), Second Language Teacher Education, Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Ghana-History and Background (n.d.).

Glatthorn, A. A. (1990). Theories of supervision: Introduction. In, G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak, (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision. pp. 1029-1031. New York: Macmillan.

Glickman, C.D., Gordon S.P., and Ross-Gordon, J.M. (1998). Instructional Supervision: A Developmental Approach, 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Goldhammer, R. (1980). Clinical Supervision. Special Method for the Supervision of Teachers. New York: Holt, Rinchart and Winston.

Gordon, S.P. (2004). Professional Development for School Improvement: Empowering Learning Communities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. traditional engagement “A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for Introductory Physics courses. American Journal of Physics. v.66 no.1.

Hansen, J. B. (2000). ‘Student performance and Student Growth as measure of success: A evaluator’s perspective’ paper presented at annual meeting of the American Education Research Association New Orleans, Louisiana, April 25, 2000.

Hijazi, S. T. and Naqvi, S. M. M. R. (2006). ‘Factors Affecting Students’ Performance: A Case of Private Colleges’. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology: Volume 3, Number 1. Available WWW: (accessed 23 October 2012)

Jones, K. (1993) Educational Management V: Human Resources Management EMH 500A 2004 Technikon, Pretoria Journal of Education Administration 18(2):224-227.

Kelechukwu, N. (2011). Analysis of Administrative Roles of Principals in Private Secondary Schools in Aba Education Zone of Abia State. Continental J. Education Research. 4 (1): 18-27.

Landers, T.J. & Myers, J.G. (1997). Essentials of School Management. Philadelphia: W.B.S. Sounders Company, Pp. 214-215.

Marzano, R. J. Frontier, T. and Livingston, D. (2011). A Brief History of Supervision and Evaluation . Retrieved from

McGregor D. (1960). Human side of enterprise. New York, McGraw-Hill

Mushtaq, I. and Khan, S. N. (2012). Factors Affecting Students’ Academic Performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research 12(9), 16-22.

Neagley, R. L., & Evans, N. D. (1980). Handbook for effective supervision of instruction (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Nolan, J. F., Jr. (1997). Can a supervisor be a coach? No. In J. Glanz & R. F. Neville (Eds.), Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies (pp. 100-112). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.

Nolan, J. F. and Francis, P. (1992). Changing perspectives in curriculum and instruction. In C. D. Glickman (Ed.), Supervision in transition: The 1992 yearbook of the association for supervision and curriculum development (pp. 44-60). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Noble, J. P., Roberts, W. L., and Sawyer, R. L. (2006). ‘Student Achievement, Behavior, Perceptions, and Other Factors Affecting ACT Scores’. ACT Research Report Series 2006 - 1.

Oduro, G. (2008). Increased enrolment does not mean quality education [Electronic version]. Ghana News Agency. Retrieved from education/200809/20151.asp.

Opare, J. A. (1999). Academic Achievement in Private and Public Schools: Management makes the difference. Journal of Educational Management, 2, 1-12.

Shachar, M. and Neumann, Y. (2010). Twenty Years of Research on the Academic Performance Differences Between Traditional and Distance Learning: Summative Meta-Analysis and Trend Examination. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching Vol. 6, No. 2, June 2010.

Ukeje, B. (1992). Educational Administration. Enugu: Four Dimension Publishing Company Ltd.

Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. (1993). Supervision: A redefinition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Sullivan, S. & Glanz, J. (2000). Supervision that improves teaching: Strategies and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Inc.

Wiles, J., & Bondi, J. (1996). Supervision: A guide to practice (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Merrill.



  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License


If you find difficulties in submitting manuscript please forward your doc file to Our support team will assist you in submission process and other technical matters.

In order to get notifications on inbox please add in your email safe list.

Journal of Arts and Humanities (Print) ISSN:2167-9045

Journal of Arts and Humanities (Online) ISSN: 2167-9053

[Journal of Arts and Humanities previously published by MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, MD, USA. From February 2018 this journal is published by the LAR Center Press, OR, USA]