A Psycholinguistic Study of the Reflection of First Language Acquisition in Bilingualism: A Case Study


  • reem omar maghrabi King Abdulaziz university




Fossilization, segmental change, phonological processes, bilingualism, language acquisition, language transfer.


 This study focuses on fossilization and its influence on language acquisition processes. It attempts to trace the phonological errors to decide what factors affect the occurrence of phonological fossilization. The study will trace the existence of phonological linguistic processes underlying segmental sound change such as segment addition, segment loss, segment movement, and segment substitution. The study is done on two types of speech; spontaneous and formal speech by a bilingual. Therefore, this will help to seek whether fossilization could be attributed to other factors rather than L1 acquisition processes. It has been found that L1 acquisition processes such as, overgeneralization, simplification and transfer play a considerable role in phonological fossilization in the aforementioned types of speech. It is found that fossilization occurs more frequently in formal speech than in spontaneous speech. The unconscious production of the second language speaker (i.e. the bilingual) is minimizing the phonological fossilized errors. Hence, there may be a correlation between the consciousness and the frequency of the fossilized phonological errors in the speech.

Author Biography

reem omar maghrabi, King Abdulaziz university

department of European Languages


Cambell. J. (1998). Interlanguage Phonology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Hatch, T. (1978). Types of Interference. In Focus on the Learner. New York: Macmillan.

Hocket, C.F. (1965). Sound Change, Language. Berlin: Mounton de Gruyter.

Krashen, W. (1977). Interference and Structural Complexity. Rowley Mass: Newbury House.

Lenneberg, D. (1973). Language Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Loup, L. & Weinberrger, P. (1992). The Change of Sounds. California: University of California Press.

McKibbin, P. Linguisti Form. (1995). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nakuma, C. (1998). A New Theoretical Account of “Fossilizatio”.London: Kegan Paul International.

Neufeld, L. (1977). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.

Ohala, J. (1993). The Listener as a Source of Sound Change. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 17, Papers from the Parasessions on Language and Behaviour: 178-203.

Passy, O. (1890).. Introduction to Fossilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Peck, L. (1977). Morphological Effects on Speech. London: Oxford University Press.

Roach, P (1993). English Phonetics and Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Roseberry – Mackkibbin, T. (1995). Syntactic Parsing and Working Memory. Amesterdam: John Benjamins.

Selinker, L. (1979). Interlanguage. New York: Modern Language Association.

………….& Lakshmana, U. (1992). Language Transfer and Fossilization. Amesterdam: John Benjamins.

………….& Lamendella, J. (1979). Two Perspectives on Fossilization in Interlanguage Learning. Chicago: Universiity of Chicago Press.

Scovel, A. (1969). Cognitive Neuroscience of Speech Processing. Cambrideg: MIT Press.

Tollefson, J. & Firn, J. (1983). Fossilization in Second Language Acquisition: Ann inter-model view. RELC Journall, 14, 19-34.

Trask, T. (1996). When Syntax Meets Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vigil, N. & Oller, J. (1976). Rule Fossilization : A tentative Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wanner, D. (1989). On Metathesis in Diachrony. Indiana: Indiana University Press.