Breathing Spaces: Educating Indoor Plant Carbon Absorption through Interaction

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v7i10.1510

Keywords:

building performance, interaction art, indoor air quality, carbon absorption, climate change education

Abstract

Climate change is a constant natural phenomenon. However, human activities over the last century have caused drastic changes well beyond its natural trajectory. Due to the unprecedented changes to the environment, rapid solutions to combat the consequences of climate change need to be implemented. Whatever strategy is adopted, education is key in order to achieve goals. Education interventions can be used to facilitate knowledge acquisition, skill development and build attitudes. Art-based education has become increasingly popular among educators, specifically in explaining scientific principles within a visualised environment using the latest technologies. Interior Design is a discipline that relies on visual thinking but lacks empirical work on using these developing technologies to capture student attention and transfer knowledge. This paper presents a study that explores digital art created to communicate the principle of using indoor plants as a means to purify air. The research is designed as a four-step action research project in which one cycle is completed. The results revealed that students were interested in the artwork, regardless of their level of prior knowledge of the subject.

Author Biographies

Niranjika Wijesooroya

Niranjika Wijesooriya is an architect, she holds a BSc (BE), MSc (Archi) and  Mphil (Archi) from the University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. She is a chartered member of the Royal Institute of British Architects and the Society of Environmental Engineers in the UK. She is an Associated Professional at the Green Building Council of Sri Lanka. She was Senior Lecturer at the National School of Business Management, Sri Lanka and is currently undertaking her PhD in at the University of Sydney, Australia

Caitilin de Berigny, The University of Sydney

Dr Caitilin de Bérigny is a Lecturer and Researcher at the University of Sydney. She is a member of the Design Lab, an interdisciplinary research group. Caitilin is a member of the Sydney Environment Institute and currently working on an ARC grant with the Australian National Museum and Natural History Museum in New York. Caitilin is leading the Health & Creativity Node at the Charles Perkins Centre. Caitilin has been awarded numerous grants, exhibited and published widely. Her artworks have been exhibited widely internationally. She has studied and worked internationally in France and the USA.

References

Allwright, Dick, and Kathleen M. Bailey. (1991). Focus on the Language Classroom: An Introduction to Classroom Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

American Chemical Society. (2016). Great Life and More. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oVw9CNRQ8U.

Bringslimark, T., Hartig, T., & Patil, G. G. (2007). Psychological Benefits of Indoor Plants in Workplaces. Putting Experimental Results into Context, 42 (3): 581–587.

Brönnimann, S. (2002). Picturing climate change. Climate Research. 22: 87-95.

Carr, W., and Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education Knowledge and Action Research. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.

Cohen, Louis,‎ Lawrence Manion and Keith Morrison. (2000). Research Methods in Education (5th edition). Oxford: RoutledgeFalmer

De Berigny, C., & Woolsey, E. (2012). Climate Change Education: Fostering Dialogues Between Science and Art. The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, 3(2): 145-155.

Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for educational change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Henson, S. A. et al. (2017). Rapid emergence of climate change in environmental drivers of marine ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14682.

Hopkins, D. (1985). A Teacher's Guide to Classroom Research. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Kemmis, Stephen, and Robin McTaggart. (1982). The Action Research Planner. Victoria: Deakin University Press.

Lerman, J. C. (1975). How to interpret variations in the carbon isotope ratio of plants: biological and environmental effects. In: Marcelle R. (eds) Environmental and Biological Control of Photosynthesis. Springer, Dordrecht.

Lewin, Kurt. (1951). Field theory in social sciences. New York: Harper & Row.

Lohr, V.I, Pearson-Mims, C.H. and Goodwin, G.K. (1996). Interior plants may improve worker productivity and reduce stress in a windowless environment. J. Environ. Hort, 14: 97-100.

Manzo, K. (2010). Beyond polar bears? Re-envisioning climate change. Meterological Applications 17: 196-208.

McKeown, R. (2002). from ESDtoolkit: http:www.esdtoolkit.org. Accessed October 20 2012

National Research Council. (2002). Abrupt Climate Change: Inevitable Surprises. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10136.

Nicholson-Cole, S. (2005). Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 29: 255–273.

O'Leary, Zina. (2004). The Essential Guide to Doing Research. California: SAGE.

O’Neill, S. & Hulme, M. (2009). An iconic approach for representing climate change. Global Environmental Change 19: 402–410.

O'Neill, S. & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear Won't Do It” Promoting Positive Engagement With Climate Change Through Visual and Iconic Representations. Science Direct 30 (3): 355-379.

Rainey, Kristine. (2017). 15 Ways the International Space Station is Benefitting Earth. Downloaded from: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/news/15_ways_iss_benefits_earth. NASA Stennis Space Center; Stennis Space Center, MS.

Schön, D.(1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Stewart , D.& Hessami, G. (2005). A study of methods of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration––the sustainability of a photosynthetic bioreactor approach. Energy Conversion and Management, 46 (3): 403-420.

Susman, G. (1983). Action Research: A Sociotechnical Systems Perspective. Ed. G. Morgan. London: Sage Publications.

UNESCO-UNEP. (1975). The UNESCO-UNEP Environmental Education Program.

UNESCO. (1978). Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education. Paris, France.

US Green Building Council. (2011). US Green Building Council Annual Report. Washington D. C.: USGBC

Wolverton, B. C., Douglas, W. L. & Bounds, K. (1989). A Study of Interior Landscape Plants for Indoor Air Pollution Abatement. Downloaded from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19930072988.pdf. NASA Stennis Space Center; Stennis Space Center, MS.

Wolverton, B. C., Johnson, A. & Bounds, K. (1989). Interior Landscape Plants for Indoor Air Pollution Abatement. Downloaded from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19930073077.pdf. NASA Stennis Space Center; Stennis Space Center, MS.

Yang, D. S., Pennisi, S. V., Son, K., Kays. S. J. (2009). Screening Indoor Plants for Volatile Organic Pollutant Removal Efficiency. HortScience, 44 (5): 1377-1381.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-10

Issue

Section

Article