Framing the Palestinian-Israeli Representations in Western Media Discourse in the Aftermath of Trump's Declaration of Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel

Authors

  • Baseel Al Bzour AABU
  • Maleeha Faisal Abu Anzeh AABU, Mafraq, Jordan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/jah.v10i12.2219

Keywords:

De-legitimizationPower, Critical Discourse Analysis, the Independent, Pragmatics, Semiotics.

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims at identifying the discursive practices in depicting the representations of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict within a ‘specialized corpus’, about seventy thousand words, from the Independent, a leading representative newspaper in the West, by adopting Critical Discourse Analysis, CDA, covering the period between December 2017 and January 2018. The texts of this corpus comprise a sample of articles which approached the subject of Donald Trump’s declaration of Jerusalem to be the official capital of Israel. The study has fundamentally relied on various theoretical backgrounds related to CDA mainly stated by Fowler 1991, Fairclough 1995b, and Leeuwen 2008. The study showed that the Independent has used various discursive practices; calling the unmarked, belligerent rhetoric, down-grading techniques, euphemism, assimilation and stable mechanisms, to draw structural power relations between in-group American voice parallelized with Israeli voice and out-group Palestinian voice to delegitimize the Palestinians' sense of sovereignty of Jerusalem. The study concluded that the Independent is a conservative newspaper by virtue of the evident discursive strategies used by the newspaper.

Key Words: Palestinians, Israelis, De-legitimization, Power, Critical Discourse Analysis, the Independent, Pragmatics, Semiotics.

References

References:-

Amer, M. (2009). ‘Telling-it-like-it-is’: the delegitimation of the second Palestinian Intifada in Thomas Freidman's discourse. Discourse

& Society, 20(1), 5-31.

Amer, M. (2017). Critical discourse analysis of war reporting in the international press: The case of the Gaza war of 2008-2009. Social Sciences, Palgrave Communications.

Bovis, H. E. (1971). The Jerusalem Question. Stanford, Calif: Hoover Institution Press.

Bowman, G. (2013). Christian Ideology and the Image of a Holy Land: the place of Jerusalem pilgrimage in the various Christians. ResearchGate, 98-121.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Cambridge Advance Learner's Dictionary.

Caldas-Coulthard, C. & Coulthard, M. (1996). Texts and Practices:Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.

Faiclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995a). Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1995b). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

Faisal, Maleeha. (2019). Framing the Palestinian-Israeli Representations in Western Media Discourse in the Aftermath of Trump's Declaration of Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel. Unpublished MA Thesis. Mafraq: AABU.

Foucault, M. (1981). The Order of Discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader. Boston, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. The University of Chicago Press, 8(4), 777-795.

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News. London: Routledge.

Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Jones, G. (1979). The Ideology of Middle Management. In R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress & T. Trew (Eds.), Language and Control. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

House, J., & Kasper, G. (1981) Polietness Markers in English and German. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational Routine. Mouton, The Hague.

Jakobson, R.(1971c). Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb, repr. In R. Jakobson (Ed.), Selected Writings. The Hague: Mouton.

Khalidi, W. (1978). Thinking the Unthinkable: A Sovereign Palestinian State. Foreign Affairs, 56(4), 695-713.

Kollek, T. (1977). Jerusalem. Foreign Affairs, 55(4), 701-716.

Lakoff, G. (1987). A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. Philosophical Review, 96(4), 589-594.

Rapoport, A. (1993). On the Nature of Capitals and their Physical Expression. In J. Taylor, J. G. Lengelle & C. Andrew (Eds.), Capital Cities. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.

Said, E. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. New York, Vintage Books.

Trew, T. (1979). Theory and Ideology at Work. In R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress & T. Trew (Eds.), Language and Control. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In: Caldas-Coulthard CR, Coulthard M (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis, 3, 32–70.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Disciplinary. New York: Palgrave Machine.

Wenden, A. (2005). The Political of Representation: A Critical Discourse Analysis of An Aljazeerfa Special Report. International Journal of Peace Studies, 10(2), 89-112.

Wodak, R., & Weiss, G. (2005). Analyzing European Union Discourse. In R. Wodak & P. Chlinton (Eds.), A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-17

Issue

Section

Article

Similar Articles

1-10 of 332

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.