Reading-to-write: A Practice of Critical Thinking
Keywords:Reading-to-write, student-centered, critical thinking
AbstractReading-to-write, a term taken from language testing studies, puts great emphasis on a student-centered learning atmosphere, on the situational context and cooperative learning, on an authentic learning environment, on making use of various information resources, and on the process of the individuals’ meaning construction and critical thinking. The application of this model in class will shed lights on College English teaching in China, providing the English teachers with a new perception of language teaching: Reading and writing can be integrated to elicit more authentic language use, and skill training and critical thinking are not two separate stages.
Cavdar, G. & Doe, S. (2012). Learning through Writing: Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in Writing Assignments . PS: Political Science and Politics, (2): 298-306.
Condon, W. & Kelly-Riley, D. (2004). Assessing and teaching what we value: The relationship between college-level writing and critical thinking abilities. Assessing Writing, (9): 56-75.
Cumming, A. (2013). Assessing integrated writing tasks for academic purposes: Promises and perils. Language Assessment Quarterly, (1):1-8.
Gao, Qiuping. (2013). The Development of Chinese English Majors’ Thinking in Argumentative English Writing. Foreign Language Press.
Gebhard, M. et. al. (2013). Teaching to mean, writing to mean: SFL, L2 literacy, and teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing, (22): 107-124.
Hirvela, A. & Du, Qian. (2013). “Why am I paraphrasing?”: Undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source-based academic writing and reading. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, (12):87-98.
Hood, S. (2008). Summary writing in academic texts: implicating meaning in processes of change. Linguistics and Education, (19): 351-365.
Lee, Hye-Jung & Lim, C. (2012). Peer Evaluation in Blended Team Project-based Learning: What do Students Find Important?. Educational Technology and Society, (15): 214-224.
Murray, R. (2013). ‘It’s not a hobby’: reconceptualizing the place of writing in academic work. Higher Education, (1): 79-91.
Plakans, L. (2008). Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks. Assessing Writing, (13): 111-129.
Plakans, L. & Gebril, A. (2012). A close investigating into source use in integrated second language writing tasks [J]. Assessing Writing, (17): 18-34.
Plakans, L. & Gebrial, A. (2013). Using multiple texts in an integrated writing assessment: source text use as a predictor of score. Journal of Second Language Writing, (22): 217-230.
Saxton, E., Belinger, S. & Becker, W. (2012). The Critical Thinking Analytic Rubric (CTAR): Investigating intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a scoring mechanism for critical thinking performance assessments. Assessing Writing, (17): 251-270.
Thompson, C., Morton, J, & Storch, N. (2013). Where from, who, why, and how? A study of the use of sources by first year L2 University students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, (12): 99:-109.
Zhang, Zongfei & Xi, Xianjie. (2012). Project-Based Learning and Its Application. In Advances in Education Research. Information Engineering Research INST, USA. 233-236.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).