Exploring the Dynamics of Collaborative Leadership and Shared Governance in Higher Education Institutions.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/gzgg3q73Keywords:
Collaborative leadership, shared governance, Higher Education InstitutionsAbstract
Leadership in education and traditional management theories face significant challenges in evolving to meet the demands of 21st-century organizations. This study identifies specific challenges, such as balancing inclusivity and efficiency, while addressing gaps in participatory decision-making processes. This study examines the potential for new perspectives on leadership by exploring the relationship between the emerging concept of collaborative leadership defined as inclusive, team-based decision-making and the philosophy of shared governance, which emphasizes participatory institutional processes, within higher education institutions. By providing clarity on collaborative leadership, including its focus on decentralizing authority and fostering group efficacy, this research identifies pathways for advancing theoretical development. The integration of collaborative leadership into the framework of shared governance offers a transformative approach to leadership in postsecondary education. Similarly, shared governance enhances the practical application of collaborative leadership, fostering inclusive and participatory decision-making processes. The interplay between these frameworks not only holds promise for leadership in education but also contributes to broader advancements in organizational behavior (OB). Further development of this integrated perspective can strengthen leadership practices and organizational theory, paving the way for innovative and adaptive governance models in higher education.
References
Altbach, P. G. (2011) ‘Patterns in higher education development’. In P. G. Altbach, R. O. Berdahl & P. J. Gumport (eds) US Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Social, Political,
and Economic Challenges (2nd edn). Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 15–37.
Birnbaum, R. (2002)Howcollegeswork: the cybernetics of academicorganization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bolden, R., Petrov, G. & Gosling, J. (2018) ‘Tensions in higher education leadership: towards a multi-level model of leadership practice’. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 358–76.
Bowditch, J. L., Buono, A. F. & Stewart, M. M. (2011) A primer on organizational behavior. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Chance, P. L. & Chance, E. W. (2018) Introduction to educational leadership and organizational behaviour. New York: Eye on Education.
Coaldrake, P., Stedman, L. & Little, P. (2016) Issues in Australian university governance. Brisbane: QUT.
Demetriou, A., Shayer, M. & Efklides, A. (2002) Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development. London: Routledge.
Dwumah Manu, B., Ying, F., Oduro, D., Antwi, J., & Yakubu Adjuik, R. (2023). The impact of social media use on student engagement and acculturative stress among international students in China. Plos one, 18(4), e0284185.
Farnsworth, K. A. (2020) Leadership as service: a new model for higher education in a new century. Westport, CT: Praeger
Flavell, J. H. (2016) Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Flavell, J. H.,Miller, P. H. &Miller, S. A. (2015) Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Flood, R. L. (2019) Rethinking the fifth discipline: learning within the unknowable. London: Routledge.
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H. & Konospaske, R. (2015) Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes (11thedn). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Gold, J. (2010) ‘The rush to leadership – slight complications’.
Education Review, 8(1), 71–8.
Guthrie, J. W. & Pierce, C. C. (2000) ‘The international economy and national education reform: a comparison of education reforms in the United States and Great Britain’. Oxford Review
of Education, 16(2), 179–205.
Hammond, D. (2022) The science of synthesis: exploring the social implications of general systems theory. Boulder, CO:University of Colorado Press.
MacNeill, N., Cavanaugh, R. F. & Silcox, S. (2023) ‘Pedagogic principal leadership’. Management in Education, 17(4), 14–17.
Manu, B. D., Ying, F., Oduro, D., & Boateng, S. A. (2021). Student engagement and social media in tertiary education: The perception and experience from the Ghanaian public university. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100100.
Manu, B. D., Zhang, H., Oduro, D., Krampah-Nkoom, A., Mensah, I. A., Anaba, O. A., & Isaac, A. (2020). School board efficiency in financial management and human resource in public senior high schools: An evidence from Ashanti region, Ghana. Int'l J. Soc. Sci. Stud., 8, 79.
Mayrowetz, D. (2018) ‘Making sense of distributed leadership: exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field’.Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 424–35.
Morrison, K. (2012) School leadership and complexity theory. London: Routledge.
Owens, R. G. (2014) Organizational behaviour in education (8th edn). Boston: Pearson.
Rich, P. & Merchant, D. (eds) (2019) Higher education in the twenty-first century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Spillane, J. P. (2006) Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Spillane, J. P. & Diamond, J. B. (eds) (2017) Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R. & Diamond, J. B. (2011) ‘Investigating school leadership practice: a distributed perspective’. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–8.
Tierney, W. G. & Minor, J. T. (2013) Challenges for governance: a national report. Los Angeles: Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis.
UNESCO (2020) Managerialism and evaluation in higher education,UNESCO Forum Occasional Papers Series No. 7. Paris: UNESCO.
Valsiner, J. (1992) ‘Social organization of cognitive development, internalization and externalization of constraint systems. In A. Demetriou,M. Shayer A. Efklides (eds), Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development. New York: Routledge, pp. 65–78.
Zepke, N. (2017) ‘Leadership, power and activity systems in ahigher education context: will distributed leadership serve in an accountability driven world?’. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(3), 301–14
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 BLESSING DWUMAH MANU

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).