Neuroqueer Intimacies in Online Dating Apps
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/jah.v12i4.2361Keywords:
neuroqueerness, intimacy, online dating, stigmatisation, autoethnographyAbstract
What can we learn from the intimacies bypassing neurotypical understanding of relationships? Drawing from neurodiversity studies (Yergeau, 2018, 2020; Egner, 2019; Kapp, 2020), I question the widespread notion of intimacy connected to neurotypical familial sexual relationships. This paper includes a bibliographic review of neuroqueer intimacies, followed by autoethnographic journal entries that recall the experiences of a neurodivergent, autistic person seeking intimate connections on dating apps. I comment on Remi Yergeau’s critique of the ‘Cassandra Affective Deprivation Disorder.’ CADD is allegedly a condition that would affect neurotypical partners of autistics. CADD’s tropes stigmatise neurodivergent traits as being male-based and a societal burden. It erases the neurodivergent folks who are neither heterosexual nor cis-gender identified (Bertilsdotter Rosqvist et al., 2020). Cassandra’s bias reinforces a normative view of how some bodies should perform (Yergeau, 2020), and the traits of a normative performance are scrutinised in intimate platforms. In dating apps, there is a constant requirement to prove the ability to perform neurotypical traits, like constant eye contact and linguistic and gestural displays of affectivity.
References
Baird, A. (2020). “Teaching While Autistic: Constructions of Disability, Performativity, and Identity,” Ought: The Journal of Autistic Culture, 2(1). Retrieved from:
https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/ought/vol2/iss1/5
Bechdel, A. (2008). The essential dykes to watch out for. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Berlant, L. (1998). Intimacy: A Special Issue. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 281–288.
https://doi.org/10.1086/448875
Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, H., & Jackson-Perry, D. (2020). Not Doing it Properly? (Re)producing and Resisting Knowledge Through Narratives of Autistic Sexualities. Sexuality and Disability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-020-09624-5
Butler, J. (2011). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
Callen, K. (2020). Disabled sexualities: A theoretical review of sociological approaches and a call to problematise the normative/non-normative dialectic. Sexualities, online first.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460720973892
Carman, M., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2017). Tinder Me Softly – How Safe Are You Really on Tinder? Security and Privacy in Communication Networks, 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59608-2_15
Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as Method. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Danielson, M., & Kemani, M. (2021). When Saga Norén meets neurotypicality. In Normalizing Mental Illness and Neurodiversity in Entertainment Media (pp. 96–109). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003011668-8
Edelman, L. (2004). No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke University Press.
Egner, J. E. (2019). “The Disability Rights Community was Never Mine”: Neuroqueer Disidentification. Gender & Society, 33(1), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218803284
Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek: Rowman Altamira.
Ferrara, R., Nappo, R., Ansermet, F., Ricci, P., Massoni, F., Carbone, G., … Ricci, S. (2021). The Impact of DSM-5 on the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Psychiatric Annals, 51(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20201205-01
Finch, J. (2007). Displaying Families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072284
Forstie, C. (2017). A new framing for an old sociology of intimacy. Sociology Compass, 11(4), e12467. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12467
Goffman, E. (1990). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin Books.
Gray, S., Kirby, A. V., & Graham Holmes, L. (2021). Autistic Narratives of Sensory Features, Sexuality, and Relationships. Autism in Adulthood (00), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2020.0049
Hillary, A. (2020). Neurodiversity and cross-cultural communication. In Neurodiversity Studies (pp. 91–107). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429322297-10
Hiki. (n.d.). Hiki | Autistic Dating App. Retrieved October 1, 2022, from https://www.hikiapp.com/
Hull, L., Petrides, K., Allison, C., Smith, P., Baron-Cohen, S., Lai, M.-C., & Mandy, W. (2017). ‘Putting on my best normal’: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(8), 2519–2534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3166-5
Hutson, J. A., Taft, J. G., Barocas, S., & Levy, K. (2018). Debiasing Desire. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274342
Jenkins, S., Montford, K. S., & Taylor, C. (Eds.). (2020). Disability and Animality.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003014270
Johnson, M. L. (2021). Neuroqueer Feminism: Turning with Tenderness toward Borderline Personality Disorder. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 46(3), 635–662.
https://doi.org/10.1086/712081
Lorenz, T., Reznik, N., & Heinitz, K. (2017). A Different Point of View: The Neurodiversity Approach to Autism and Work. In Autism - Paradigms, Recent Research and Clinical Applications. https://doi.org/10.5772/65409
Milton, D. E. M. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: the ‘double empathy problem.’ In Disability & Society (27, 6), 883–887. Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.710008
Kapp, S. K. (Ed.). (2020). Autistic community and the neurodiversity movement: Stories from the frontline. Palgrave Macmillan
Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 78–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.78
Koch, R., & Miles, S. (2020). Inviting the stranger in: Intimacy, digital technology and new geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, online first.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520961881
Manning, E. (2012). Always More Than One: Individuation’s Dance. Durham: Duke University Press.
Matthews, M. (2019). Why Sheldon Cooper Can’t Be Black. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 13(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2019.4
McDermott, C. (2021). Theorising the neurotypical gaze: autistic love and relationships in The Bridge. Medical Humanities, Published Online First: January 27 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2020-011906
MacKenzie, A. (2018). Prejudicial stereotypes and testimonial injustice: Autism, sexuality and sex education. International Journal of Educational Research, 89, 110–118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.10.007
McWade, B., Milton, D., & Beresford, P. (2015). Mad studies and neurodiversity: a dialogue. Disability & Society, 30(2), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.1000512
Milton, D., Murray, D., Martin, N., Ridout, S., & Mills, R. (Eds.). (2020). Neurodiversity reader. Pavilion Publishing.
Milton, D. (2013). ‘Filling in the Gaps’: A Micro-Sociological Analysis of Autism. Autonomy, The Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.larry-arnold.net/Autonomy/index.php/autonomy/article/view/7
Muñoz, J. E. (2009). Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York: New York University Press.
Nordgren, A. (2006). The short instructional manifesto for relationship anarchy. Retrieved from http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/andie-nordgren-the-short-instructional-manifesto-for-relationship-anarchy#toc9 on 01/13/21.
Perry, E., Hull, L., Mandy, W., & Cage, E. (2020). Understanding camouflaging as a response to autism-related stigma: A Social Identity Theory approach. Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7w2pe
Preciado, P. B. (2018). Countersexual manifesto. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rosqvist, H. B., Chown, N., & Stenning, A. (Eds.). (2020). Neurodiversity Studies: A New Critical Paradigm. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429322297
Shakespeare, T. (2010). "The Social Model of Disability." The Disability Studies Reader. Ed. Lennard J. Davis. Routledge, 2010.
Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. (K. H. Wolff, Ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Spry, T. (2001). Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 706–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700605
Timmermans, E., Hermans, A.-M., & Opree, S. J. (2020). Gone with the wind: Exploring mobile daters’ ghosting experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520970287
Timimi, S., Milton, D., Bovell, V., Kapp, S., & Russell, G. (2019). Deconstructing Diagnosis. Autonomy, 1(6).
Vehmas, S. (2019). Persons with profound intellectual disability and their right to sex. Disability & Society, 34(4), 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1545110
Walker, N., & Raymaker, D. M. (2021). Toward a Neuroqueer Future: An Interview with Nick Walker. Autism in Adulthood, 3(1), 5-10. http://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2020.29014.njw
Willey, A. (2016). Undoing Monogamy: The Politics of Science and the Possibilities of Biology. Durham: Duke University Press.
Woods, R., Milton, D., Arnold, L., & Graby, S. (2018). Redefining Critical Autism Studies: a more inclusive interpretation. In Disability & Society, 3(6) 974–979.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1454380
Yergeau, M. (2018). Authoring Autism: On Rhetoric and Neurological Queerness. Durham: Duke University Press.
Yergeau, M. (2020). Cassandra Isn’t Doing the Robot: On Risky Rhetorics and Contagious Autism. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 50(3), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2020.1752132
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Francisco Trento
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
