Evaluation of Factors Affecting Implementation of Green Public Procurement in Laikipia County Government, Kenya.

Elijah Mwangi Ngunjiri

Abstract


Green Public Procurement has been used as a tool to achieve environmental objectives by some countries especially in Europe. Public procurement in Kenya is estimated to account for between 70 and 80 percent of the national budget.  This gives the government purchasing power to influence manufacturing and supply of green products for sustainable development. County governments in Kenya are allocated between 15 and 45 percent of the total country’s income.  Despite all these finances Counties possess, many of them do not fully use their purchasing power to achieve environmental objectives. Laikipia County for example, did very well on procurement activities to be ranked the best performing entity in public procurement in Kenya in 2014, yet it did not have a similar identity on Green Public Procurement. It is this research gap that this study sought to fill. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting implementation of Green Public Procurement in Laikipia County government. The study was guided by knowledge gap, buyers’ perception, management policies and technical capacity of suppliers as independent variables and implementation of Green Public Procurement as the dependant variable.  The study targeted County governments in Kenya. The study population was 45 employees from Laikipia County government drawn from procurement and finance department. Primary data was collected by use of a self administered semi structured questionnaire.  Statistical model of multiple regression were used in analysis of data. The study established the value of knowledge gap, β1=0.561, buyer’s perception on GPP,β2=0.143, management policy,β3= 0.095, and technical capacity of suppliers to supply GP,β4=0.142 had all have a positive effect on GPP implementation. The study recommends County governments to organize for compulsory training of its staff on GPP. They should conduct lifecycle costing of all products procured by the county governments so as to create the right perception on these product, create awareness of importance of introducing a GPP policy and modalities of implementing it and County governments to make sure all suppliers dealing with them have requisite environmental certification from the National Environmental Management Authority and insist on only eco-labeled products.


Keywords


Green Products, Convectional Products, Green Public Procurement, Environmental Objectives, Resources Sustainability

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Bordens, S.K &Abbort, B.(2008). Research design and methods. Process approach: New York: McGraw-Hill publication.

Carbon Disclosure Product (2013). Green procurement, evidence based research. Paper on best practice from Public and private sector. Retrieved May 11, 2015, from www.cdp.net.

Cooper,R. & Schndler,P.S. (2008). Business research methods.New York:McGraw Hill-Hill publication.

Eriksson,P. & Kovalainen,A.(2008) Qualitative methods in business research (1stEd.).London:Sage Publications.

European Commission.(2005). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the review of the sustainable development strategy -Retrieved Aug 2014,fromlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.

Gatari, N. C., & Were, S. (2014). Challenges facing implementation of green Procurement in manufacturing sector in Kenya: A case study of Unga Limited Kenya. European Journal of Business Management, 2(1), 161-173.

Government of Kenya.(2010).The constitution of Kenya. Nairobi: Government printers.

Government of Kenya. (2013).Laikipia County- first County development integrated development plan 2013-2017. Nairobi: Government Printers.

Government of Kenya.(2014) Public procurement oversight authority annual report. Nairobi: Government Printers.

Government of Kenya.(2015).Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act of Kenya. Nairobi: Government Printers.

Hawkes, G. and Rowe, G. A. (2008). A Characterisation of the Methodology of Qualitative Research on the Nature of Perceived Risk: Trends and Ommissions. J Risk Res, Vol 11, pp. 617-643.

Hyden, H.(2002). Norm vetenskopsociologica institution. Lund: Universitet publication.

Israel, G.D. (2012). Determining sample size. University of Florida. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) Extension, 1-5.

International Institute for Sustainable Development. (201I). IISD Country Projects on Sustainable Public Procurement. Retrieved 10 August, 2014, from http://www.iisd.org/Markets/country projects.

Langat, K. (2013). An implementation of inbound logistics management on Public procurement performance at public institutions in Kenya: a case study on Kenya Medical supplies agency. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, 1 (3), 90-101.

Mertens, D. M. (2010).Research & Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative & Mixed Methods. London: Sage Publications.

Mugenda, O.M., &Mugenda, A.G. (2003).Research methods.(3rd Ed.). Nairobi: Act Press publication.

Nasiche, F., &Ngugi, G. K. (2014). Determinants of adoption of green procurement in the public sector: A case study of Kenya Pipeline Company. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, 1(11), 351-372.

National Environment Management Authority (2013) Effect of climate change. Nairobi: Government printers.

Nderitu, K. M., &Ngugi, K. (2014). Effects of green procurement practices on an organization performance in manufacturing industry: Case study of East African Breweries Limited. European Journal of Business Management, 2 (1), 341-352.

Omwoha, E.A. (2015)Constituents that affect the implementation of sustainable. Public procurement in Kenyan Public Universities: A case of Technical University of Kenya. Strategic Journal of Management.Vol.2 (9), pp144-176.

Orodho, J. A., (2003). Regional Inequalities of education, population and poverty Patterns in Kenya: Emerging issues and policy directions. Population of Kenya Journal Vol 1, pp241-65.

Roos, R. (2013) Sustainable public procurement in Lics. Berlin: Giz publication.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation, (4th Ed.). New York: Free Press.

Saunder, M. Lewis, P.&Thornhill. (2009). Research method for business students, (5th Ed.). United Kingdom: Pitman publishing.

Schiffman, L.G., Kanuk, L.L, & Hansen, H. (2008).Consumer behaviour: A European Outlook. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.

Sekaran, &Bougie, R. (2009). Research methods for business Skill Building Approach. London: Wiley & sons publication.

United Nations Environmental Programme (2013).Sustainable public procurement- A global Review. New York: United Nations publication.

United Nations Environmental Programme (2014).Green economy assessment report – Kenya. New York: United Nations publication.

Walker, H., &Preuss, L. (2008).Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: Public sector perspectives.Journal of Cleaner Production, 16: 1600-1609.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18533/journal.v7i10.1471

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




.............................................................................................................................

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

.............................................................................................................................

If you find difficulties in submitting manuscript please forward your doc file to support@theartsjournal.org. Our support team will assist you in submission process and other technical matters.

In order to get notifications on inbox please add theartsjournal.org in your email safe list.

Journal of Arts and Humanities (Print) ISSN:2167-9045

Journal of Arts and Humanities (Online) ISSN: 2167-9053

[Journal of Arts and Humanities previously published by MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, MD, USA. From February 2018 this journal is published by the LAR Center Press, OR, USA]