An Ethical Foreign Policy? Globalism as a Threat to the US National Interest
Keywords:Globalism vs. National Interest, Unethical Foreign Policy, American Exceptionalism vs. Hegemony.
AbstractAn ethical foreign policy can have no objectives other than those that are of service to its own people. An unethical foreign policy, however, may pursue objectives that enhance the nation as a power, seeking dominance for its own sake, for the honor, glory and wealth of the state or a minority within the state, or spreading its ideology out of missionary fervor. The mainstream wisdom in the United States is that the US foreign policy agendas are virtuous and ethical, since they are oriented mainly towards the protection and enhancement of the American ‘National Interest’. Nevertheless, the orthodox perception among many foreign observers is that the American foreign policy is by no means ethical, since it is oriented exclusively towards the promotion of the Americans’ interests at the expense of the rest of the world. My thesis is that the US foreign policy is unethical and anti-democratic mainly because it is causing a lot of harm to the American taxpayers’ interests. I esteem that the American people are the real permanent victims of their country’s globalist stance. This article is based on an argumentative criticism of the mainstream American perception of U.S. foreign policy as well as a criticism of the foreign observers’ perception of American foreign policy. In a nutshell, this article tries to highlight the unethical nature of the American foreign policy with a focus on the complex justifications for such an undemocratic globalist agenda.
Steven, K. (2009). America’s global image in the Obama era. WorldpublicOpinion.org, 7, 3-11.
US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.com.
World military expenditures: top ten spenders in 2010. (April 2001). Retrieved from www.sipri.org/yearbook/2011/04/04A.
The 15 countries with the highest military expenditures in 2011. (September 2012). Retrieved from
www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/resultoutput/milex_15-NBC News/Wall Street Journal Survey, September 26-30, 2012, p. 11,
Zinn, H. (2002). Operation enduring war. The Progressive, 3, 24-28.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).