Craftsmanship and the Teleology of Mastery: An Interview with an Austrian Luthier
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/tjwd3b82Keywords:
Craftsmanship, lutherie, tacit knowledge, material culture, craftsmanship ethicsAbstract
This article investigates core professional and philosophical tensions within contemporary craftsmanship through a critically framed interview with Anna Wagner, an Austrian luthier. By situating lutherie within a theoretical framework that engages Richard Sennett’s humanist praxis, David Pye’s “workmanship of risk,” and Tim Ingold’s concept of material “correspondence,” the study explores the teleology of artisanal practice amidst technological proliferation. The dialogue reveals a definition of mastery grounded in holistic process-comprehension and ethical restraint—specifically through the “less is more” axiom in restoration. The article argues that the luthier’s work serves as a cultural intermediary, preserving the “soul” of historical instruments through embodied, non-replicable expertise that resists the accelerated logic of digital production. It concludes by identifying systemic challenges for material culture, particularly the validation of qualitative value and the pedagogy of tacit knowledge transfer in a market-driven environment.
References
Annachord. (n.d.). https://annachord.at/home
Dondi, P., Lombardi, L., Porta, M., Rovetta, T., Invernizzi, C., & Malagodi, M. (2019). What do luthiers look at? An eye tracking study on the identification of meaningful areas in historical violins. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(14), 19115-19139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7276-2
Figueiredo, M. D., & Ipiranga, A. S. R. (2015). How can we define mastery? Reflections on learning, embodiment and professional identity. BAR — Brazilian Administration Review, 12(4), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2015150019
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Homo Faber. (n.d.). Anna Wagner. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://www.homofaber.com/en/artisans/anna-wagner-t2q0tg
Howard, K. (2022). Musical instruments as tangible cultural heritage and as/for intangible cultural heritage. International Journal of Cultural Property, 29(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739121000436
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208963
Lindley, M. (1977). Authentic Instruments, Authentic Playing. The Musical Times, 118(1610), 285-288. https://doi.org/10.2307/958046
Loomis, J. (2025). 3D printing reproductions of Indigenous instruments in practice: Ethical replication and acoustic sovereignty. Music & Science, 8, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043251364053
Osman, S., Zin, N. A. H. M., Ashaari, N. S., & Omar, Y. (2011). Model for courseware development of teaching and learning traditional craft (CDTC model): Initial validation. In 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Informatics (ISCI) (pp. 975-980). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCI.2011.5958885
Pye, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge University Press.
Renney, N., Gaster, B., Mitchell, T., & Renney, H. (2022). Studying how digital luthiers choose their tools. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-18). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.351765
Sennett, R. (2009). The craftsman. Penguin Books.
Smith, A. (2018). Reconnecting the music-making experience through musician efforts in instrument craft. International Journal of Music Education, 36(4), 560-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761418771993
Trček, K. (2016). Invaluable cultural heritage or the fading image of the past: The state of historical organs in the territory of present-day Slovenia through the example of the organs of Joannes Franciscus Janechek. Arti musices, 47(1-2), 117-132. https://hrcak.srce.hr/173162
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mei-Hsin Chen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
