The Study of Morphological, Structure of Art and DNA of Antique Carved Rhinoceros Horns

Authors

  • Teeputai Saengas The Hariphunchai Oriental Ancient Art Museum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/wxmdas11

Keywords:

Morphological, Art History, Antique Carved Rhinoceros Horns

Abstract

This article aimed to study the art history to analyze antique carved rhinoceros horns combined with the morphology and DNA testing cytochrome b DNA barcoding using the PCR technique. The hypothesis is that DNA extracted from ancient rhinoceros horn tissue has complete DNA strand integrity and could be amplified to create a DNA profile. The results of the study found that art history and morphology analysis can be examined in antique carved rhinoceros horn considering, the structure of art such as lines, form, color, and space, because the carvings are designed and the shape of the artwork is adjusted according to the rhinoceros horn morphology. Meanwhile, the symbolic interpretations of antique carved rhinoceros horn can explain the lifestyles of the people at the time they were created. Including being able to explain changes and developments in culture, traditions, and beliefs in each era. Next, the DNA analysis of antique rhinoceros horns carved using DNA barcode techniques from 8 samples was able to confirm only 1 sample as white rhinoceros DNA, which is 12.5% of the total sample. Therefore, the research results can be concluded to reject the hypothesis because the tissue from the ancient carved rhinoceros horn could not be tested for DNA.  

References

Arnold, S. J. (1983). Morphology, Performance and Fitness, American Zoologist, 23(2), 347-361.

But, P. P. H., Lai-Ching, L. and Yan-Kit, T. (1990). Ethnopharmacology of Rhinoceros Horn. I: Antipyretic Effects of Rhinoceros Horn and Other Animal Horns. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 30(2), 157-168.

Chadwick, C. S. (1995). Morphology. The American Biology Teacher, 17(1), 14-16.

Dang Vu, H. N. and Nielsen, M. R. (2021). Evidence or Delusion: A Critique of Contemporary Rhino Horn Demand Reduction Strategies. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 26(4), 390-400.

Gao, Y., Stoner, K. J., Lee, A. T. and Clark, S. G. (2016). Rhino Horn Trade in China: An Analysis of the Art and Antiques Market. Biological Conservation, 201, 343-347.

Harris, J. (2006). Art History: The Key Concepts. Routledge.

Hartwig, M. (2011). An Examination of Art Historical Method and Theory. A Case Study. In Methodik und Didaktik in der Ägyptologie (pp. 313-326). Brill Fink.

Hieronymus, T. L., Witmer, L. M. and Ridgely, R. C. (2006). Structure of White Rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) Horn Investigated by X‐Ray Computed Tomography and Histology with Implications for Growth and External Form. Journal of Morphology, 267(10), 1172-1176.

Hübschle, A. (2020). Fluid interfaces between flows of rhino horn. In The Policing of Flows (pp. 34-53). Routledge.

Jha, D. K., et al. (2015). A Comparative Study of Some Morphological and Microscopic Identifying Features of Genuine Rhino (Rhinoceros unicornis) Horns and Fake Horns. Journal of Forensic Research, 6, 315.

Li, S. Q., Zu, E. D. and Liu, L. J. (2011). Identification of Rhinoceros Horn and Its Substitutes. Advanced Materials Research, 177, 636-639.

Pooke, G. and Newall, D. (2008). Art History: The Basics. Routledge.

Vu, H. N. D., Nielsen, M. R. and Jacobsen, J. B. (2022). Conserving Rhinos by Legal Trade: Insights from a Choice Experiment with Rhino Horn Consumers. Ecological Economics, 193, 107287.

Wake, D. B. (1982). Functional and Evolutionary Morphology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 25(4), 603-620.

Yang, S. (2011). A Review of Rhinoceros Horn, ENGR3810 Structural Biomaterials, 1-10.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-23

Issue

Section

Article

Similar Articles

1-10 of 345

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.