Remaking the Humanities
Neoliberal Logics, Wicked Problems, and Survival Post-Covid
Keywords:humanities, neoliberalism, wicked problems, design thinking, applied learning
AbstractThe “market value” of the Humanities is, once again, in crisis, but this time it is decidedly more actual than perceived thanks to the international financial collapse of 2008 and more recently to the economic repercussions of the Covid-19 global pandemic. Despite the resistance many of us in the Humanities might feel characterizing our work in terms of “market value,” I argue that we must embrace, rather than resist, neoliberal logics as a way to revise and reframe our teaching and scholarship for the evolving academic marketplace. More specifically, I argue that we can reform our work in relation to the interdisciplinary constructs of “wicked problems” and “design thinking,” and that we should do so as a way to foster our students’ production-oriented skill sets for working with local and global stakeholders across corporate contexts, government workplaces, legal and educational settings, and activist organizations. I provide concrete examples to describe, illustrate, and make the case for reforming the Humanities more radically than the incremental adjustments and re-branding gestures currently underway.
ADE Ad Hoc Committee on the English Major (2018). A changing major: the report of the 2016–17 ADE Ad Hoc Committee on the English major. (https://www.ade.mla.org/content/download/98513/2276619/A-Changing-Major.pdf)
Ahlburg, D., Ed. (2018). The Changing Face Of Higher Education?: Is There An International Crisis In The Humanities? London: Routledge.
Alford, J. & Head, B.W. (2017). Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework. Policy & society, 36(3), 397–413.
Bizzell, P. (1992). What is a discourse community? In Bizzell, P., Academic Discourse and Critical Consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 222-237.
Bitzer, L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric (1), 1–14.
Brown, W. (2011.) Neoliberalized knowledge. History of the Present, 1(1), 113–129.
Burke, K. (1965). Terministic screens. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 87-102.
Burke, L. (2021). Biden’s billions for higher ed. Inside Higher Ed. (https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/04/01/what%E2%80%99s-2-trillion-infrastructure-plan-higher-ed)
Camillus, J. (2008). Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Business Review, May 2008, 98-106.
Camillus, J. (2016). Wicked Strategies: How Companies Conquer Complexity and Confound Competitors. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Conley, B. (2019). The great enrollment crash. The Chronicle of Higher Education. (https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-great-enrollment-crash)
Crowley, S. (2006). Toward a Civil Discourse: Rhetoric and Fundamentalism. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Department of Public and Applied Humanities | University of Arizona (2021). (https://pah.arizona.edu)
Fish, S. (2010). The crisis of the humanities officially arrives. New York Times Opinionator. (https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/11/the-crisis-of-the-humanities-officially-arrives)
Fish, S. (1980). Is There a Text in this Class: The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Frassinelli, P. (2019.) Crisis? which crisis? The Humanities Reloaded. 33(3): 1–15.
Friedman, M. (1982). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Grawe, N. (2018). Demographics and the Demand for Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Internships & career readiness (2019). Department of Public and Applied Humanities | University of Arizona. (https://pah.arizona.edu/academics/internships)
Jaschik, S. (2018). Shocker: humanities grads gainfully employed and happy. Inside Higher Ed. (https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/02/07/study-finds-humanities-majors-land-jobs-and-are-happy-them)
Katopodis, C. & Davidson, C. (2019). Changing our classrooms to prepare students for a challenging world. Profession. (https://profession.mla.org/changing-our-classrooms-to-prepare-students-for-a-challenging-world)
Kelderman, E. & Gardner, L. (2019). The Looming Enrollment Crisis: How Colleges are Respnoding to Shifting Demographics and New Student Needs. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Kelly, K., Linder, K., Tobin, T., & Kim, J. (2020). Going Alt-Ac?: A Guide to Alternative Academic Careers. Bloomfield: Stylus Publishing.
Klein, N. (2007). The Shock Doctrine?: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, 1st ed. ed. New York: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt.
Leverenz, C. (2014). Design thinking and the wicked problem of teaching writing. Computers and Composition, 33(1), 1–12.
Lönngren, J. & Van Poeck, K. (2021). Wicked problems: a mapping review of the literature. International Journal Of Sustainable Development And World Ecology, 28(6), 481–502.
Marback, R. (2009). Embracing wicked problems: the turn to design in composition studies. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), 397-419.
Marcus, J. (2018). With Enrollment sliding, liberal arts colleges struggle to make a case for themselves. The Hechinger Report. (http://hechingerreport.org/with-enrollment-sliding-liberal-arts-colleges-struggle-to-make-a-case-for-themselves)
McCarthy, M. (2017). Promising Practices in Humanities PhD Professional Development: Lessons Learned from the 2016-2017 Next Generation Humanities PhD Consortium. National Endowment for the Humanities | The Council of Graduate Schools.
Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167.
Nguyen, T. (2019). U. of Wisconsin at Stevens Point pulls back from plan to cut 6 liberal-arts programs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. (https://www.chronicle.com/article/u-of-wisconsin-at-stevens-point-pulls-back-from-plan-to-cut-6-liberal-arts-programs)
Nietzel, M. (2019). Whither the humanities: the ten-year trend in college majors. Forbes. (https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2019/01/07/whither-the-humanities-the-ten-year-trend-in-college-majors)
Pannapacker W (2021) On why I’m leaving academe. The Chronicle of Higher Education. (https://www.chronicle.com/article/on-why-im-leaving-academe)
Pratt, M. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, Modern Languages Association, 33–40.
Purdy, J. (2014). What can design thinking offer writing studies? College Composition and Communication, 65(4), 612–641.
Sheridan, D., Ridolfo, J., & Michel, A. (2012). The Available Means of Persuasion: Mapping a Theory and Pedagogy of Multimodal Public Rhetoric. Anderson: Parlor Press.
Rittel, H. & Webber, M. (1972). Dilemmas in A General Theory Of Planning, Working Paper, No. 194. Berkeley: University of California.
Rogers, K. (2020). Putting the Humanities PhD to Work: Thriving in and Beyond the Classroom. Durham: Duke University Press.
Schmidt, B. (2018). The humanities are in crisis. The Atlantic. (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/08/the-humanities-face-a-crisisof-confidence/567565)
Vatz, R. (1973). The myth of the rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric 6(3), 154–161.
Writing Assessment: A Position Statement (2018). Conference on College Composition and Communication. https://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/writingassessment)
Zhang, L. (2010). The Humanities: Their Value, Defence, Crisis, and Future. Diogenes (229-230, 1-2), 91-108.
Copyright (c) 2022 Phillip Darin Payne
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).