Form, Uncertainty, and the Reduction of the Arbitrary in Postmodern Poetry

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v7i8.1458

Keywords:

Aesthetic objects, poetic form, postmodern poetry, systems theory.

Abstract

This article examines how uncertainty and the reduction of arbitrariness simultaneously create the tension necessary for the formal existence of the modern and postmodern poem in English.  Building on sociologist Niklas Luhmann’s extensive investigations of art as one of many modern autopoietic social systems, the author examines how the system of poetry seeks to reduce the arbitrariness of utterances while simultaneously maintaining the semantic and syntactical uncertainty necessary for a poem’s formal existence as an aesthetic (quasi)object.  The author examines poetry’s necessary resistance to code-formulations, concluding that the “noise” in poetic utterance is necessary to maintain the system of poetry given the social pressures of rampant legalism, fundamentalism, and hyper-commodification in which experience itself is being reduced to manipulable quanta.

Author Biography

Eric S. Rawson, University of Southern California

I am an Associate Professor (Teaching) of Writing at the University of Southern California.  I hold a Ph.D. in Literature and Writing from the University of Southern California and an M.F.A. in Fiction from the University of Iowa Writers' Workshop.

References

Adorno, T. (1974) Minima moralia: reflections of a damaged life. London: New Left Books.

Ashbery, .J (1984) Selected poems. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

Empson, W. (1966) Seven types of ambiguity. New York, NY: New Directions.

Esposito, E. (1999) “Two-sided forms in language.” Problems of form. Trans.

Hayles, N. (1999) How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, T. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Luhmann, N. (1990) Essays on self-reference. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Luhmann, N. (2000a) Art as a social system. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Luhmann, N. (2000b) Theories of distinction: redescribing the descriptions of modernity. Ed. William Rasch. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

McCarthy, T. (1978) The critical theory of Jürgen Habermas. London: Hutchinson & Company.

Michael Irmscher and Leah Edwards. Ed. Dirk Baecker. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Mullen, H. (2002) Sleeping with the dictionary. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Rasch, W. (2000) Niklas Luhmann’s modernity: the paradoxes of differentiation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Schmidt, B. and Jahraus, O. (1999) “Systems theory and literary studies in the 1990s.” The Germanic review. 74, 242-254.

Wilson, T. (2002) Strangers to ourselves: discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-29

Issue

Section

Article