Make bread out of stones: a psychoanalysis on the process of temptation

Authors

  • Joelle Chamieh Universite Catholique de Louvain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v4i6.743

Keywords:

temptation, free will, quantum consciousness, strong will, weak will, self-determination theory (SDT)

Abstract

this study is based on an innovative framework where the internal development of temptation is deeply analyzed through the functions of the will so as to provide a blueprint for an effective obstruction of the temptation process.  Our methodological approach finds its foundation in the analysis of the three temptations of Jesus, as presented in the bible. In order to achieve our goal, we tried to show that the will is free before entering into the debate of strength and weakness of will. We, therefore, rationalized freedom of will through quantum physics only to move to our next step that analyzes the performances of strength and weakness of will. Moreover, through the usage of the self-determination theory, we performed a psychological analysis that has helped us decipher the mechanisms of the process of temptation. Based on our findings, we then formulated our final analysis by relying on the three temptations of Jesus, which provided us with a constructive rationale for the interpretation of the basic human vulnerabilities and their relations to the basic psychological needs and the approach to address them

References

Bigelow, J., Dodds, S. M., & Pargetter, R. (1990). Temptation and the Will. American Philosophical Quarterly , 27 (1), 39-49.

Day, J. (1993). Temptation. American Philosophical Quarterly , 30 (2), 175-181.

Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry , 11 (4), 227-268.

Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The Darker and Brighter Sides of Human Existence:Basic Psychological Nees as Unifying Concept. Psychological Inquiry , 11 (4), 319-338.

Ellenberger, J. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious: The history and evolution of dynmic psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.

Freud, S. (1959). Formulations regarding the two principles of mental functioning. In E. Jones, Collected papers of Sigmund Freud (J. Reviere, Trans., Vol. 4, pp. 13-21). New York: Basic Books.

G.S. (1890). The meaning of the Temptation. The Old and New Testament Student , 10 (4), 242.

Hoffman, P. (1995). Freedom and Strength of Will: Descartes and Albritton. Philosophical Studies: An international Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition , 77 (2/3), 241-261.

Kaku, M. (2006). Parallel Worlds. New York: First Anchor Books.

Keefe, F. J. (2002). City of God.net. Retrieved from htt.://www.cityofgod.net

Kent, B. (2007). Aquinas and Weakness of Will. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , 75 (1), 70-91.

Lauri, A., Jensen-Campbell, & Graziano, W. G. (2005). The Two Faces of Temptation: Differig Motives for Self-Control. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly , 51 (3), 287-314.

Mathews, G. (1966). Weakness of Will. Mind, New Series , 75 (229), 405-419.

McCown, C. (1919). The Temptation of Jesus Eschatologically and Socially Interpreted. The Biblical World , 53 (4), 402-407.

Nietzsche, F. (1918). The genealogy of morals. New York: Bonnie & Liveright.

Sartre, J. P. (1956). Being and nothingness. New York: Citadel.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-18

Issue

Section

Article