Sociocultural and Economic Conditions as Causes of the Weakened Social Cohesion in Landless Peasants


  • Dumasari Dumasari Muhammadiyah Purwokerto University
  • Budi Dharmawan Faculty of Agriculture, Jenderal Soedirman University
  • Imam Santosa Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Jenderal Soedirman University
  • Wayan Darmawan Faculty of Foresty, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor
  • Pujiati Utami Muhammadiyah Purwokerto University
  • Dinda Dewi Aisyah Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada



Economic conditions, conversion of agricultural land, landless peasants, social cohesion, sociocultural conditions.


Conversion of agricultural land to non-agriculture is one of the main reasons that causes peasants to lose productive jobs and create poverty. However, the flow of land conversion turned out to be difficult to control, so the number of peasants continued to decrease over time. The location of this study was set intentionally in the villages of Purbalingga Wetan Subdistrict, Purbalingga Regency and Baturaden, Banyumas Regency, Central Java Province, Indonesia. The research method is an intrinsic case study. The results of the study show that the weakening of social cohesion in peasant begins with the process of fragmentation. Social cohesion weakens at the level of individuals, communities and institutions. The sociocultural conditions that underlie the weakening of landless peasants' social cohesion are weak motivation, waning work values and norms, self perception as individuals who are a little strong, depleted collectivity, stretching social interaction, weak trust, micro motivated cooperation network, sense of belonging , self-exploitation and risk aversion. The underlying economic conditions include economic urgency, commercial labor relations, wage systems, subsistence economic morals, global market penetration and rising costs of living needs. Weak social cohesion facilitates peasant participation in various participatory empowerment programs. Therefore, strengthening social cohesion in community peasants is urgent and important in order to build solidarity and generate ownership empowerment programs.


Creswell. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. Sage Publication. California.

D. Dumasari, TSM. Rahayu, S. Budiningsih. (2013). Pengembangan usaha mikro souvenir Kreatif Olahan Limbah Kelapa dengan Teknologi Modifikasi Desain Produk sesuai Trend Pasar untuk Pemberdayaan Petani Miskin. Reports Result Research Grant Featured of Universities Ditlitabmas DIKTI. Jakarta. University of Muhammadiyah Purwokerto.

D. Dumasari, W. Watemin. (2013). Karakteristik sosial ekonomi petani miskin dalam pengelolaan usaha mikro tourism souvenir goods. Mimbar: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 29 (2), 205-214.

D. Dumasari. (2014). Kewirausahaan petani dalam pengelolaan bisnis mikro di pedesaan. Jurnal Inovasi dan Kewirausahaan, 3 (3), 196-202.

D. Dumasari, and T.S.M. Rahayu. (2016). Management strategy of creative souvenir microenterprise for the Empowerment of craftsmen peasant. Mimbar: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 32 (1), 175-186.

D. Dumasari, S. Budiningsih, W. Darmawan, I. Santosa. (2017). Various determinant factors of production technology adoption in creative souvenir micro-enterprise, Journal of Arts and Humanities, 6 (10), 01-06.

D. Dumasari, W. Darmawan, A. Iqbal, B. Dharmawan, I. Santosa. (2019). Development of production creativity among craftsmen by identifying techniques characterizing coconut waste. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9 (2), 712-723.

Fonseca, Xavier, Stephan Lucosch, Frances Brazier. (2019). Social cohesion revisited: A new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation: The European Jpurnal of Social Science Research, 32 (2), 231-253.

Giardiello, Mauro. (2014). The generative Theory of Social Cohesion and civic integration. European Scientific Journal, 2, 80-89.

Gyau, Amos, Steven Franzel, Maryben Chiatoh, Godwill Nimino and Kwadwo Owusu. (2014). Collective action to improve market access for smallholder producers of agroforestry products : lessons learned with insights from Camaerun’s experience. Journal of Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6, 68-72.

Larsen, C.A. (2013). The rise and fall of social cohesion: The construction and de-construction of social Trust in the US, UK, Sweden and Denmark. Oxford: OUP.

Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. (1991). Designing Qualitative Research. Mac Graw Hill Company. New York.

Novy, Andreas, Daniela Coimbra Swiatek, and Frank Moulaert. (2012). Social cohesion: A conceptual and political elucidation. Journal of Urban Studies, 49 (9), 1873–1889.

Ofuoku, Albert Ukaro, Oluwaseun Ijeoma Ekorhi and Robinson. (2018). Social inclusion of landless peasants in extension services in Delta State, Nigeria. Implications for agricultural development. De Gruiter Journal, 3, 226-235.

Pahl, R. E. (1991). The search for social cohesion: from Durkheim to the European commission. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 32, 345–360.

Santosa, I. D. Dumasari. (2018). Development empowerment strategy of street food traders based on community in Purwokerto City. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 7 (12), 10-17.

Usman, Zainab Aina and Kehinde Oluseyi Olagunju. (2017). Assessment of social cohesion indicator and rural poverty reduction in Nigeria. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 17 (4), 339-346.

Zheng. Tianxhiang. (2018). From landlessness to homelessness: exploring landless Peasant’s loss of belongingness after Land expropriations in urban China. American Journal of Engineering Research, 6 (10), 281-284.







Similar Articles

1-10 of 338

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.