Animal Images and Metaphors in Animal Farm
Keywords:Animal farm, animal image, metaphor.
AbstractIn literary works animal images are frequently used as the “source domain” of a metaphor to disclose the natures of the “target domain”, human beings. This is called “cross-domain mapping” or “conceptual metaphor” in cognitive linguistics, which is based on the similar qualities between animals and human beings. Thus the apparent descriptions of the animals are really the deep revelations of the human beings. Animal Farm is one exemplary product of this special expressing way. Diversified animal images are intelligently used by George Orwell to represent the people, so all the characters are animals in appearance, but humans in nature. Starting from the animal images and then the conceptual metaphors, readers can perceive a fresh understanding of this classical book. In this novel, three conceptual metaphors are identified and the special findings can be illustrated as the following: Firstly, the whole story of the animals represents the history and politics of the Soviet Union. Secondly, the pigs symbolize the authorities of the society. Thirdly, the names of the characters in the novel reveal their identities.
Chen, S. B. 2008. The Symbolic Meaning in Animal Farm. Journal of Chengdu University, 22(6): 112-114.
Jerolmack, C. 2009. Humans, Animals, and Play: Theorizing Interaction When Intersubjectivity is Problematic. Sociological Theory, (27): 371-388.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980/2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Liu, Y. & Chen, R. 2013. The Collection of Absurdity in Animal Farm—“Pig”, the leader of revolution. Journal of Hubei TV University, 33 (11): 80-81.
Orwell, G. 1945/2000. Animal Farm. China Zhigong Press.
Pearce, R. 1998. Orwell, Tolstory, and Animal Farm. The Review of English Studies, 49 (193): 64-69.
Slater, M. B. 2012. Rethinking Human-animal Ontological Differences: Derrida’s “Animot” and Cixous’s “Fips”. Contemporary French and Francophone Studies, 16 (5): 685-693.
Sopory, P. 2005. Metaphor and Affect. Poetics Today, 26 (3): 433-458.
Walsh, F. 2009. Human-Animal Bonds I: The Relational Signiﬁcance of Companion Animals. Family Process, 48 (4): 462-480.
Xu, H. Y. 2015. Animal Farm from the Perspective of Feminism. Xueyuan, (2): 69-70.
Zhang, J. S. & Wang W. D. 2014. On the Narrative Arts in Animal Farm. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 22 (4): 78-81.
Zhao, Y. H. 2010. Black Humor in George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Journal of Jilin Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 27 (3): 115-117.
Zhou, X. Y. & Xu, H. Y. 2011. The Studies of Animal Farm in China. Literature Research, 244-247.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).