Don DeLillo's Great Jones Street: Commodification and Pandemonium
Keywords:Don DeLillo, Great Jones Street, commodification, contemporary America, the market economy, fetish.
AbstractThe future modern condition of humanity is at stake; the market economy rationalizes and mechanizes people; reduces them to objects that consume objects. Material value predominates human value. Meaning is lost; it is equal to the accumulation of tangible objects. The complexity of human condition in the 21st century has become one of the most widely explored topics among scholars, writers, and critics in American literature. Given that DeLillo's character Bucky Wunderlick exemplifies this complexity, this paper proposes to explore Wunderlick’s treatment to commodification imposed upon him by the crowds (audience/masses) and market economy. In this paper, these crowds and the economic system are reduced to the notion of Pandemonium. It denotes chaos, a state of extreme confusion and disorder. My reading of Wunderlick’s commodification in contemporary America grounds on Marx and Engels' definition of the concept. I strengthen my argument with Jean Baudrillard, Guy DeBord, Lucas, and Adorno. On the whole, this study aspires to further expand the understanding of the future plight of human beings in the post-contemporary (my italics) America.
Adorno, T.W. (2005). The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. Routledge.
Baudrillard, J. (2016). The Consumer Society: Myths and structures. Sage.
Baudrillard, Jean. (1983). “In the Shadows of the Silent Majorities, or The End of the Social and Other Essays translated by Paul Foss.” Paul Batton, and John Johnson, New York: Semiotext (e).
Baudrillard, J. (1998). Jean Baudrillard: selected writings, edited by Mark Poster. Cambridge and Stanford Polity and
Stanford University Press, UK.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge, UK, Polity Press.
Boxall, P. (2008). Don Delillo, and Media Culture. Cambridge University Press.
Cox, J. (1998). “An Introduction to Marx's Theory of Alienation.” International Socialism.
Debord, G. (2012). Society of the Spectacle. Bread and Circuses Publishing.
DeCurtis, A. (1990). “The Product: Bucky Wunderlick, Rock ‘n Roll, and Don DeLillo’s Great Jones Street,” Introducing Don DeLillo, Frank Lentricchia, Duke University Press, Durham, pp. 131-141
DeLillo, D. (1998). Great Jones Street. Picador.
Kellner, D. (1989). “Boundaries and Borderlines: Reflections on Jean Baudrillard and Critical Theory”. Current
Perspectives in Social Theory, Vol. 9, No.1, pp. 5-22.
Koch, A.M. & Elmore, R. (2006). “Simulation and Symbolic Exchange: Jean Baudrillard’s Augmentation of Marx’s Theory of Value”. Politics & Policy, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 556-575.
Logan, R.K. (2010). Understanding New Media: Extending Marshall Mcluhan. Peter Lang.
Lukács, G. (1971). History, and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. R. Livingstone, Trans. London: Merlin.
Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1967). The Communist Manifesto. 1848. Trans. Samuel Moore. London: Penguin.
Marx, K. & Bottomore, T.B. (1964). Early writings: Translated and edited by TB Bottomore. Foreword by Erich Fromm. McGraw-Hill.
Marx, K. (1867). Capital, volume I.
Osteen, M. (2008). “Delillo’s Daedalian Artists.” Cambridge University Press, pp. 137-50
Schussler, A. (2013). “Pornography and Postmodernism”. Postmodern Openings/Deschideri Postmoderne, Vol. 4, No. 3.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).