King Lear Reveals the Tragic Pattern of Shakespeare


  • Salim Eflih Al-Ibia Al al-Bayt University



Dual realization of crimes, Revenge, Tragic pattern of Shakespeare.


Rather than focusing on the obvious traditions of evaluating Shakespearean tragic heroes, this paper presents a groundbreaking approach to unfold the pattern William Shakespeare follows as he designed his unique characters. This pattern applies to most, if not all, Shakespearean tragic heroes. I argue that Shakespeare himself reveals a great portion of this pattern on the tongue of Lear as the latter disowns Goneril and Regan promising to have “such revenges on [them] both” in King Lear. Lear’s threats bestow four unique aspects that apply not only to his character but they also apply to Shakespearean tragic heroes. Lear’s speech tells us that he is determined to have an awful type of revenge on his daughters. However, the very same speech tells us that he seems uncertain about the method through which he should carry out this revenge. Lear does not express any type of remorse as he pursues his vengeful plans nor should he aim at amnesty. He also admits his own madness as he closes his revealing speech. This research develops these facts about Lear to unfold the unique pattern Shakespeare follows as he portrayed his major tragic figures. This pattern is examined, described and analyzed in King Lear, Othello, and Hamlet. We will find out that the pattern suggested in this study helps us better understand Shakespeare’s tragedies and enables us to provide better explanations for some controversial scenes in the tragedies discussed.  

Author Biography

Salim Eflih Al-Ibia, Al al-Bayt University

English Department, Assistant Professor


Al-Ibia, S. (2013). Beyond the religious and the Secular: the Hyprid Nature of Forgiveness in Early Modern Drama. Unpublished Dissertation: Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Bradley, A. C (1992). Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, and Macbeth. London: Penguin.

Bacon, F. (1998). Francis Bacon: A Critical Edition of Major Works. Ed: Brian Vickers. Oxford: Oxford UP.

Bromwich, D. (2010). “What Shakespeare's Heroes Learn.” Raritan, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 132-148.

Dekker, T. (1965). The Shoemaker’s Holiday. Ed: J. B. Steane. Los Angeles: Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Harold Bloom (2008). Shakespeare Through the Ages: King Lear. InfoBase Publishing.

Heywood, T. (1961). A Woman Killed with Kindness. Ed, Van Fossed. London: Methuen

Hyde, I. (1963). “The Tragic Flaw: Is It a Tragic Error?” The Modern Language Review, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 321-325. JSTOR.

Kriegel, J. (2010). “A Case against Natural Magic: Shakespeare’s Friar Laurence as Romeo and Juliet’s Near-Tragic Hero.” Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture, no. 1, p. 132-144. EBSCOhost.

Kumaresan P, (2011). “Claudius and Macbeth: A Comparison between a Villain and a Tragic-Hero.” Journal of Literature, Culture & Media Studies, vol. 3, no. 5/6, pp. 162-170. EBSCOhost.

Marlowe, C. (1989). Dr. Faustus. Ed: Roma Gill. London: A&C Black.

Peat, D. (1982). “And That's True Too: King Lear and the Tension of Uncertainty, in Aspects of King Lear.” New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43–53.

Reid, B. L. (1958). “Yeats and Tragedy.” The Hudson Review, Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 391-410. JSTOR.

Rao, C. S. (2014). “Teaching Shakespeare.” IUP Journal of English Studies, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 70-76. EBSCOhost.

Shakespeare, W. (1999). All’s Well that Ends Well. Ed: Stephen Orgel. London: Penguin Books.

Shakespeare, W. (1999). King Lear. Ed: Stephen Orgel. London: Penguin Books.

Shakespeare, W. (1970). Hamlet. Ed: G.B. Harrison. London: Penguin Books.

Shakespeare, W. (1970). Othello. Ed: G.B. Harrison. London: Penguin Books.