Double Life: Music as Work and Serious Leisure
Keywords:Music, Psychological Recovery, Serious Leisure, Well-Being at Work, Work.
AbstractSerious leisure (SL) is defined as an intensive, long-term free-time activity which has deep meaning for an individual and generates its own rewards without external incentives. SL has been studied intensively, yet studies on the mutual effects of an individual’s work and SL are scanty, especially when music is either the work or the SL. Our research addressed the connection between work and SL with both musicians and non-musicians. The data consisted of nine interviews. Four of the participants were professional musicians with various SLs (acting, woodwork, handicrafts, and urban culture). The other five (an architect, a librarian, two directors, and a project manager), conversely, had music as their SL. Qualitative content analysis of the data was conducted, and we analysed the data in relation to psychological recovery experiences (psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery and control), using the concepts of segmentation, spillover and compensation. The data were classified into three thematic clusters 1) Participants’ manner of talking about SL, 2) Aspects of SL, and 3) SL and work with further subdivisions into themes and categories. Our data did not show any difference between comments from the two participant groups. SL had positive effects on subjective well-being, notions of identity, and working abilities. It stimulated psychological recovery and gave meaning and content to the participants’ lives. We suggest that in today’s busy work life, employers should take advantage of SL and its positive effects.
Bauer, M.W., Bicquelet, A., & Suerdem, A.K. 2014. Text analysis: An introductory manifesto. In M.W. Bauer, A. Bicquelet, & A. K. Suerdem (Eds.) Textual analysis (pp. xxi–xlvii). SAGE Benchmark in Social Research Methods, 1. London: SAGE.
Chell, E. 2004. Critical incident technique. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.) Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 45–60). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Cuenca, J., Kleiber, D.A., Monteagudo, M.J., Linde, B.D., & Jaumot-Pascual, N. 2014. The influence of meaningful leisure on the subjective well-being of older adults in the Basque Country of Northern Spain. World Leisure Journal, 56(2), 120–129.
Eschleman, K., Madsen, J., Alarcon, G., & Barelka A. 2014. Benefiting from creative activity: The positive relationships between creative activity recovery, experiences, and performance-related outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(3), 579–598. DOI: 10.1111/joop.12064.
Finnegan, R. 1989. The hidden musicians: Music-making in English town. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haney, M.R., & Kline, D.A. (Eds.) 2010. The value of Time and Leisure in a World of Work. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
Haukola, P. & Kuusi, T. 2015. Työn ja toisen tekemisen keskinäiset vaikutukset. Trio, 4(1), 6–24.
Heinonen, E. 2004. Aktiivinen harrastus työn kompensaation ja siirtymän ilmentymänä – Case matkailuoppaat. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Turun Kauppakorkeakoulu, Finland.
Heo, J., Lee, Y., McCormick, B.P., & Pedersen, P.M. 2010. Daily experience of serious leisure, flow and subjective well‐being of older adults. Leisure Studies, 29(2), 207–225.
Ivarsson, L., & Larsson, P. 2012. Personal Activities on Company Time to Make Everyday Life Work. In A. Bergman, & H. Huzell (Eds.) Segregationens seghet och dess föränderliga former. En vänbok till Lena Gonäs (pp. 127–140). Karlstad: Karlstad University Studies 25.
Kelly, J.R. 1983. Leisure identities and interactions. London: Allen & Unwin.
King, N. 2004. Using interviews in qualitative research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.) Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 11–22). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Koch, T. (2006). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(1), 91–103.
Korpela, K., & Kinnunen, U. 2010. How is leisure time interacting with nature related to the need for recovery from work demands? Testing multiple mediators. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33(1), 1–14.
Kvale, S. 1996. Inter Views: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Liu, H. 2014. Personality, leisure satisfaction, and subjective well-being of serious leisure participants. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 42(7), 1117–1125.
Liu, H., & Yu, B. 2015. Serious leisure, leisure satisfaction and subjective well-being of Chinese university students. Social Indicators Research, 122(1), 159–174.
McAuley, J. 2004. Hermeneutic understanding. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.) Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 192–202). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Miendlarzewska, E.A., & Trost, W.J. 2014. How musical training affects cognitive development: Rhythm reward and other modulating variables. Front. Neurosci.
Miller, K.A., & Kohn, M.L. 1983. The reciprocal effects of job conditions and the intellectuality of leisure-time activities. In M.L. Kohn, & C. Schooler (Eds.) Work and personality: An inquiry into the impact of social stratification (pp. 20–32). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Murray, D.W., & O'Neill, M.A. 2015. Home brewing and serious leisure: Exploring the motivation to engage and the resultant satisfaction derived through participation. World Leisure Journal, 57(4), 284–296.
Pi, L.L., Lin, Y.H., Chen, C.Y., Chiu, J.C., & Chen, Y.M. 2014. Serious leisure, motivation to volunteer and subjective well-being of volunteers in recreational events. Social Indicators Research, 119(3), 1485–1494.
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. 2007. The recovery experience questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204–221.
Stebbins, R.A. 1992. Amateurs, professionals and serious leisure. Montreal: McGill-Queen's Press.
Stebbins, R.A 1997. Casual leisure: A conceptual statement. Leisure Studies, 16(1), 17–25.
Stebbins, R.A. 1998. After work: The search for an optimal leisure lifestyle. Calgary: Detselig.
Stebbins, R.A. 2001. The costs and benefits of hedonism: Some consequences of taking casual leisure seriously. Leisure Studies, 20(4), 305–309.
Stebbins, R.A. 2003. Project‐based leisure: theoretical neglect of a common use of free time. Leisure Studies 24(1), 1–11.
Stebbins, R. A. 2009. Serious leisure and work. Sociology Compass, 3(5), 764–774.
Stebbins, R.A. 2014b. Careers in Serious Leisure. From Dabbler to Devotee in Search of Fulfillment. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
Stebbins, R.A. 2015. Leisure and Positive Psychology. Linking Activities with Positiveness. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
Sumer, H. C., & Knight, P. A. 2001. How do people with different attachment styles balance work and family? A personality perspective on work-family link age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 653–663.
Ylikännö, M. 2011. Sopivasti työtä ja vapaa-aikaa? Tutkimuksia ajankäytöstä eri elämäntilanteissa. Sosiaali- ja terveysturvan tutkimuksia 117. Helsinki: Kelan tutkimusosasto.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).