Digital Landscapes: Rethinking Poetry Interpretation in Multimodal Texts
Keywords:Poetry interpretation, multimodality, media, meaning making, digital technology
AbstractRegardless of the fact that a great deal of scholarly studies in the field of digital humanities have emphasized implementing various modes of digital literacy, critical perspectives considering the use of multimodal texts in literature, namely poetry, have received scant attention. Beyond the boundaries of printed texts and verbal means, the present study aims to cast some light on how meaning making in poetry into multimodal contexts becomes crucial to poetry interpretation in multimodal contexts. In particular, the study tackles the theory of multimodality in regard to the poetry genre and briefly reviews its significance in relevant studies. The paper then shifts to show how the multimodalities in question enhance the transformation of print-based poetic texts into creative multimodal poetry experiences. Ultimately, the study provides insight into how digital media have altered our perspectives on definitions, interpretations, and appreciation of poetry.
Block, F. W. (2007). Digital poetics or on the evolution of experimental media poetry.
In E. Kac (Ed.), Media poetry: An international anthology (pp. 229-243). Chicago:
Bowers, F. (Ed.) (1996). The classic tradition of haiku: An anthology. New York: Courier
Eliot, T. S. (2010). The Waste Land and other poems. J. Black, L. Conolly, K. Flint, I. Grundy, D. LePan, R. Liuzza, J. J. McGann, A. L. Prescott, B. V. Qualls, C. Waters. (Eds.). Toronto: Broadview Press.
Calo, K. M. (2009). Graphic poetry program guide. Retrieved fromhttp://www.brightpointliteracy.com/assets/researchfiles/NA39.pdf Clare, J. (2004). John Clare: Major works. E.
Robinson & D. Powell (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dencker, K. P. (2000). From concrete to visual poetry, with a glance into the electronic
future. Retrieved from http://www.thing.net/~grist/l&d/dencker/denckere.htm
Rampersad, A. (2001). The life of Langston Hughes: Volume I: 1902-1941, I, too, sing
America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dundas, J. (1993). Pencils rhetorique: Renaissance poets and the art of painting.
Massachusetts: University of Delaware Press.
Dymoke, S., & Hughes, J. (2009). Using a poetry wiki. English Teaching: Practice and
Critique, 8 (3), 91-106.
Gibbons, A. (2012). Multimodality, cognition, and experimental literature. New York:
Hardy, T. (1994). The collected poems of Thomas Hardy. Kent: Wordsworth Editions.
Herrick, R. (2009). The works of Robert Herrick. Boston: Harvard University. Hughes, D. J.
(2007). Poetry: A powerful medium for literacy and technology development[Monograph No. 7]. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/Hughes.pdf
Jewitt, C. (2005). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. London:
Keyes, C. (2008). The aesthetics of power: The poetry of Adrienne Rich. Athens: University
of Georgia Press.
Koskimaa, R. (2007). The challenge of cybertext: Teaching literature in the digital
world. UOC Papers, 4, 1-10.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. (1998). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated
communication: The potentials of new forms of text. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 53-79). London: Routledge. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of
contemporary communication. London: Arnold Publishers.
Lowell, A. (2002). Selected poems of Amy Lowell. M. Bradshaw & A. Munich (Eds.). New
Jersey: Rutgers University Press
Marques, D. (2012). Powered words making poetry with words in a world of images. 6th
Global Conference on Visual Literacies (1-12), UK: Oxford University.
McVee, M. B., Bailey, N. M., & Shanahan, L. E. (2008). Using digital media to interpret
poetry. Research in the Teaching of English, 43, 112-143.
McVerry, J. G. (2007). Power of posting poetry. Language Arts Journal of Michigan
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1995). Interdisciplinarity and visual culture. Art Bulletin, LXXVII (4),
Müller, Z., Eva, & Rubik, M. (Eds.). (2005). Theory into poetry: New approaches to the
lyric. New York City: Rodopi.
O'Halloran, K. L. (in press). Multimodal analysis and digital technology. In A. Baldry
& E. Montagna (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on multimodality: Theory and
practice. Campobasso: Palladino.
Roberts, B. (2011). Photographic portraits: Narrative and memory. Forum: Qualitative
Social Research, 12 (2), 1-45. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1680/3204
Royce, T., & Wendy, B. (Eds.) (2006). New directions in the analysis of multimodal
discourse. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shelley, P. B. (2002). The selected poetry and prose of Shelley. Ghatham: Wordsworth
Sidney, P. (2002). An apology for poetry. R. W. Maslen (Ed.). Manchester: Manchester
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London & NewYork: Routledge.
Torres, R. (2005). Digital poetry and collaborative wreadings of literary texts. In R. Torres
& N. Ridgway (Eds.), New media and technological (pp. 1-9). Oxford: The Inter-Disciplinary Press/Learning Solutions.
Tweddle, S., Adams, A., Clarke, S., Scrimshaw, P., & Walton, S. (1997). English for
tomorrow. Buckingham: Open University Press. Ventola, E., Cassily, C., & Kaltenbacher, M. (Eds.) (2004). Perspectives on multimodality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Williams, R. (Ed.). (1987). Unwinding the Vietnam War: From war into peace. Michigan:
Real Comet Press.
Wolosky, S. (2001). The art of poetry: How to read a poem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zheng, J. (2011). Richard Wright’s haiku, japanese poetics, and classical chinese poetry. In Y. Hakutani (Ed.), Cross-cultural visions in African American literature: west meets east (pp. 23-44). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).