Worldviews and Quality in Higher Education: a dichotomy between productivity and social responsibility
Keywords:Higher education, Quality in higher education, Conceptualizations of higher education, Neoliberalism, Social welfare state,
AbstractThis paper addresses and analyzes concepts that have been often used by important stakeholders to refer to challenges and to quality in higher education. The aim is to identify the conceptualizations of quality in higher education that underlie the use of different concepts such as efficiency and equity. Based on publications by important multilateral organizations, these terms are correlated with the conceptualizations of higher education and, at the political level, with two major contemporary socioeconomic models: neoliberalism and social welfare state. Finally, two ideological tendencies for the understanding of quality in higher education are presented: quality as productivity and quality as social responsibility.
Barnett, R., 1992. Improving Higher Education: Total Quality Care. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
Beck, U., Esping Andersen, G., Glennerster, H., Le Grand, J., Paugam, S. 2001. Presente y Futuro del Estado de Bienestar: El Debate Europeo. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.
Estrada, L. R. G., 1999. Hacia un modelo de evaluación de la calidad de instituciones de educación superior. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 21: 93-103.
European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), 2005. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Helsinki: ENQA.
European University Association, 2007. Declaração de Lisboa: universidades da Europa para além de 2010. Bruxelas: EUA.
Fazendeiro, A., 2002. Avaliação da qualidade da Educação - Uma abordagem no quadro do planejamento. In Seminário Qualidade e avaliação da educação do Ministério da Educação de Portugal.
García, M. G., 2000. Evaluación y calidad de los sistemas educativos. In Amírez, T. G. (Ed) Evaluación y gestión de la calidad educativa. Málaga: Ediciones Aljibe.
Harvey, L. & Green, D., 1993. Defining Quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1): 9-26.
OECD, 1999. Quality and Internationalisation in Higher Education. Paris: IMHE.
OECD, 2008. Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society. Paris: OECD.
Santiago, R., 1999. O conceito de qualidade no Ensino Superior. A Avaliação na Administração Pública: 355-380.
Santos, B. de S., 2005. A Globalização e as Ciências Sociais. São Paulo: Cortez.
Stiglitz, J. E., 2002. Globalization and its Discontents. New York: Norton & Company.
Teixeira, P., Jongbloed, B., Dill, D., Amaral, A. (Eds.), 2004. Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality?. Dordretcht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
UNESCO, 1997. Estándares en educación: conceptos fundamentales. Santiago: Unesco-Orealc.
UNESCO, 1998. Higher Education in the Twenty-first Century: Vision and Action. Final Report. Paris: Unesco.
UNESCO, 2003. Quality of higher education. Commission II. Paris: Unesco.
UNESCO, 2009. The New Dynamics of Higher Education and Research for Societal Change and Development. World Conference on Higher Education. Paris: Unesco.
Vroeijenstijn, T., 1992. External quality assessment, servant of two masters?
The Netherlands University Perspective. In Craft A. (ed) Quality Assurance
in Higher Education: Proceedings of International Conference Hong Kong: 1991.
Watty, K., 2005. Quality in accounting education: what say the academics?. Quality assurance in education, 13(2): 120-131.
World Bank, 1998. The Financing and Management of Higher Education: a status report on worldwide reforms. Washington: World Bank Human Development Group.
World Bank, 2002. Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary Education, Washington: World Bank Human Development Group.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).