Was Hebrew invented?

Do letter, number, and word-games in the Torah imply that Biblical Hebrew is an Invented Language?


  • Marc Egeth Exponent, Inc.




In this paper, I present a straightforward secular (non-religious, non-theological) theory: the Hebrew in the Torah is an invented language, akin to Klingon or Elvish, that was designed to write the Torah. Under this theory, the letters, words, grammar, and key terms and phrases of the Biblical language were selected, co-determined, and creatively bootstrapped as a sort of language game. The invented language may have been designed, like Esperanto or Basic English, to include elements in common with known natural languages; nevertheless, the details and final form of the language were bespoke and under the control of a creative author. In the invented system, some anagrams were defined to mean related concepts; letters were assigned number values so words and phrases could “add up to” interesting numbers (“Gematria”); and the author planned a text that would include a density of word-games like pangrams (sentences that use all letters of the alphabet), lipograms (sections of the text that are missing one particular letter), and particular numbers of letters and words throughout. However, all signs of seemingly deliberate language games might instead merely be the result of cherry picking of interesting findings. In this paper, I present analysis and new approaches that might help distinguish whether the apparent language games in the Torah imply an intentional invented language or, instead, only result from over-analysis and were not intended by the author to be present in the text.   


Belaga, E.G. (2014). Interpreting Semitic protolanguage as a conlang or constructed language I. US-China Foreign Language. 12(3):183-192.

Bradford, D. (2008). In the Beginning: Building the Temple of Zion. Bloomington: Trafford Publishing.

CALS (Conlang Atlas of Language Structures) (2020) The Tower of Babel. https://cals.info/translation/the-tower-of-babel/ [Accessed July 22, 2020].

Daf Yomi Review (2020a). Fibonacci and Genesis. http://dafyomireview.com/torah_numerology.php?d=13 [Accessed July 22, 2020].

Daf Yomi Review (2020b). Geometric Properties. http://dafyomireview.com/torah_numerology.php?d=10 [Accessed July 22, 2020].

Deza, E., and Deza, M.M. (2012). Figurate Numbers. Hackensack: World Scientific.

Drazin, I. (2009). Maimonides: Reason Above All. Jerusalem: Gefen Publishing House.

Dunn, M. (2001). Ella Minnow Pea: A Progressively Lipogrammatic Epistolary Fable. San Francisco: MacAdam/Cage Publishing.

Ginsburgh, Y. (2015). 913: The Secret Wisdom of Genesis. Jerusalem: Gal Einai Institute.

Grzybek, P. (2007). “History and methodology of word length studies,” in Contributions to the Science of Text and Language (Dordrecht: Springer) pp. 15-90.

Hall, R. (2005). Math for Poets and Drummers. Philadelphia: Saint Joseph’s University Press.

Halperin, L. (2012). Modern Hebrew, Esperanto, and the Quest for a Universal Language. Jewish Social Studies: History, Culture, Society 19(1): 1-33.

Higley, S. (2007). Hildegard of Bingen’s Unknown Language: An Edition, Translation,and Discussion. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.

Horowitz, Y., “Hebrew Word List.” PDF, 2020. http://www.rabbihorowitz.com/PYes/BB_Files/HebrewWordList10Page.pdf [Accessed July 22, 2020].

Ioannidis, J.P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2(8):e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.

Kaplan, A. (1990). Sefer Yetzirah: The Book of Creation. York Beach, ME: S. Weiser.

Kleffner, R. (2004). Lexipoeia: A Conlang Wordgen Tool. https://laptrinhx.com/lexipoeia-a-conlang-wordgen-tool-2937966151/ [Accessed November 30, 2020]

Lacaille, A.D. (1940). ASPECTS OF INTENTIONAL FRACTURE (Being notes on the flaking of some rocks other than flint as exemplified by some Scottish artifacts). Transactions of the Glasgow Archaeological Society, 9(4):313-341.

Lemos, M. (2009). Language-games in Alice's adventures in Wonderland or: How language operates in Carroll's text to produce nonsensical meanings in common-sense references. E-fabulations: e-journal of children's literature 5: 23-34.

Levitt, A. (2020). The Light of Torah Codes: Essential Introduction - Hidden Successes. http://www.torahcodes.net/new/pages/hidden_successes.html [Accessed July 22,


Leyendekkers, J., and Shannon, A. (2013). Fibonacci and Lucas primes. Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics. 19(2):49-59.

McGough, R.A. (2014). Debunking Myself: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. https://www.biblewheel.com/Blog/debunking-the-bible-wheel-the-good-the-bad-

and-the-ugly/ [Accessed July 22, 2020].

McKay, B., Bar-Natan, D., Bar-Hillel, M., and Kalai, G. (1999). Solving the Bible code puzzle. Statistical Science 14(2):150-173.

Moonesinghe, R., Khoury, M.J., and Janssens, A.C.J.W. (2007). Most published research findings are false - but a little replication goes a long way. PLoS Med. 4(2):218-221.

Nosek, B.A., Aarts, A.A., Anderson, C.J., Anderson, J.E., Kappes, H.B., and Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 349(6251): 253-267. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716

Okrent, A. (2009). In the Land of Invented Languages: Esperanto Rock Stars, Klingon Poets, Loglan Lovers, and the Mad Dreamers Who Tried to Build a Perfect Language. New York: Spiegel & Grau.

oren evron. “Fibonacci in the Torah - Genesis Golden Ratio.” YouTube Video,

September 16, 2015. https://youtu.be/OEitTICcVko

Rennie, D. (2004). Trial registration: a great idea switches from ignored to irresistible. JAMA, 292(11):1359-1362. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.11.1359.

Serafini, Luigi. (1993). Codex Seraphinianus. Milan: Franco Maria Ricci.

Singh, P. (1985). The so-called Fibonacci numbers in ancient and medieval India. Historia Mathematica, 12(3), 229-244. doi: 10.1016/0315-0860(85)90021-7.

Wimmer, G., Witkovský, V., and Altmann, G. (1999). Modification of probability distributions applied to word length research. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 6(3):257-268. doi: 10.1076/jqul.