The Necessity and Feasibility of Imposing Conventional Media Content Regulation on Digital Media Content in Indonesia (Case Study: The Controversy of Awkarin and Young Lex’s Music Video)
(Case Study: The Controversy of Awkarin and Young Lex’s Music Video)
AbstractOperating in various countries, YouTube has a content regulation that strongly influenced by American Culture. However, there are many countries that have a different culture and value compared to America, such as Indonesia. As the largest Muslim country, it has stricter social norms. In 2016, Indonesian famous Youtubers, Awkarin and Young Lex, were making a controversy by uploading music videos that containing vulgar words and exposing sexually-suggestive footages. This research aims to study how the viewers reacting to the videos, Youtubers’ perspectives, and assess how the government handles the controversy, to finally determine the necessity and feasibility of imposing conventional media content regulation on digital media. This research was conducted using mix method approach, those are content analysis and interview. The results have shown that although the videos received various negative reactions, the government decided to only give a friendly warning. Considering several sectors, the digital media content remains impossible to be detailly regulated by the government as the way conventional media regulated. Therefore, the government has applied other strategies that were maintaining excellent coordination with the digital platforms and increasing public literacy in internet using.
Abboud, R. (2013). National digital content policies: A comparative study of Arab and other countries. International Federation of Library Association and Institutions, 39(4): 294-310.
Anderson, B. (2007). Regulating the internet. Behavioral and Social Science Librarian, 26(1): 91-95.
Bauto, L. M. (2014). Perspektif agama dan kebudayaan dalam kehidupan masyarakat Indonesia. [The religion and culture's prespective of Indonesian community's life]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Social [Education and Social Science Journal], 23(2): 11-25.
Blattberg, E. (2015). YouTube makes a move against brand-sponsored videos. Digiday, 18 Feb. Available at: http://digiday.com/media/YouTube-moves-outside-overlay-ads/ [Accessed 17/03/2017].
Brandt, K. S. (2008). You should be on YouTube. ABA Bank Marketing, 40(6): 28-33.
British Board of Film Classification. (2014) BBFC classification guidelines. London: BBFC.
Cavazos, N. (2016). YouTube heroes program turns users into a neighbourhood watch. The Daily Dot, 26th Sept. Available at: https://www.dailydot.com/upstream/YouTube-heroes-program/ [Accessed 10/03/2017].
Claffy, K.C, and Clark, D. (2014). Platform models for sustainable internet regulation. Journal of Information Policy, 4: 463-488.
Creswell, John W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, Ca: SAGE.
Cummins, G. (2010). First Amendment - Indecent speech in 2010. The computer and internet lawyer, 27(3): 21-23.
Deacon, D., Pickering, M., Golding, P. and Murdock, G. (2007). Researching Communications: a practical guide to methods in media and cultural analysis. 2nd ed. London: Bloomsbury.
Diu, N.L. and Ritchie M. (2015). How YouTube changed the world. Telegraph, 9th Feb. Available at: http://s.telegraph.co.uk/graphics/projects/YouTube/ [Accessed 15/03/2017].
Federal Communications Commission. (1996). Telecommunications Act 1996. Available at: https://www.fcc.gov/general/telecommunications-act-1996 [Acceessed 01/05/2017].
Fox, J. (2016). YouTube stars slam the website as this new update stops them making money with their videos. The Sun, 1st Sept. Available at: https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/1711697/YouTube-stars-slam-the-website-as-this-new-update-stops-them-making-money-with-their-videos/ [Accessed 10/03/2017].
Hackett, L.L (2008). Taming cyberspace: broadcasting as a model for regulating the internet. Widener Law Review, 14(1): 265-296.
Harvey, W. S. (2011). Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4): 431-441.
Hautz, J., Füller, J., Hutter, K. and Thürridl, C. (2014). Let users generate your ads? The impact of video source and quality on consumer’ perception and intended behaviors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2014): 1-15.
Hidayat, R. (2016). Kontroversi Awkarin: 'upaya ‘mengontrol tubuh perempuan’. [The Awkarin controversy: the effort to 'controlling women's body']. BBC Indonesia, 28th Sept. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/majalah/2016/09/160927_trensosial_awkarin_seksualitas [Accessed 28/04/17].
Indonesia Internet Service Provider Association. (2016). Survey penetrasi dan perilaku pengguna internet Indonesia [The Indonesian internet users' behaviour survey]. Jakarta: IISPA.
Indonesian Broadcasting Commission. (2012). Pedoman pelaku penyiaran KPI [Guidance of Standard Broadcasting Program]. Jakarta: IBC.
Jarboe, G. (2009). YouTube and video marketing: An hour a day. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing Inc.
Jay, T. (1992). Cursing in America: A neuro-psycho-social theory of speech. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lange, P.G. (2014). Commenting on YouTube rants: Perceptions of inappropriateness or civic engagement? Journal of Pragmatics, 73: 53-65.
Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic.
Minico, G. D. (2013). New social rights and internet: which policies combine them. International Community Law Review, 15(3): 261-286.
Moor, P. J., A. Heuvelman. and R. Verleur. (2010). Flaming on YouTube. Computer in Human Behaviour, 26: 1536-1546.
Muslimah, S. (2016). KPAI lapor kominfo soal heboh akun Awkarin dan Anya Geraldine [Indonesia commission for children protection reported Awkarin and Anya Geraldine account]. DetikNews, 20th Sept. Available at: http://news.detik.com/berita/d-3301923/kpai-lapor-kominfo-soal-heboh-akun-awkarin-dan-anya-geraldine [Accessed 15/03/2017].
Nababan, C. N. (2017). The CEO of Telegram admitted for their late response of the requests from Indonesian government. [Sempat Kesal, Bos Telegram Akui Lalai Respons Kemkominfo]. CNN Indonesia, 16 July. Available at: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20170716095751-185-228176/sempat-kesal-bos-telegram-akui-lalai-respons-kemkominfo/ [Accessed 16/07/2017].
Ofcom. (2016a). The Ofcom broadcasting code. London: Ofcom.
Ofcom. (2016b). Attitudes to potentially offensive languange and gestures on TV and radio Research Report. London: Ofcom.
Palfrey, J. (2010). Four phases of internet regulation. Social Research, 77(3): 981-996.
Republic of Indonesia The Government Regulation Number 8 of 2014: 12 about Censor Film Board.
Republic of Indonesia The Law Number 11 of 2008 about Information and Electronic Transaction.
Republic of Indonesia The Law Number 33 of 2009 about Film.
Republic of Indonesia The Law Number 44 of 2008 about Pornography.
Rosensteel, S. (2012). Will video be the next generation in e-commerce product reviews?. Forbes, 30 May. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/seanrosensteel/2012/05/30/will-video-be-the-next-generation-in-e-commerce-product-reviews/#760e41ac61d9 [Accessed 17/04/2017].
Sapolsky, B. and Kaye. (2005). The use of offensive language by men and women in prime-time television entertainment. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 13: 292-303.
Simpson, N. (2013). YouTube comments explained: how they work. YouTube Help Forum, 16 Dec. Available at: https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/youtube/cMrA2Vv66xk [Accessed 12/05/017].
Slutsky, I. (2010). Meet YouTuber's most in-demand brand starts; for marketers, web-video celebrities offer trusted voices and an engaged viewership. Advertising Age, 13th Sept, p.8, Expanded academic ASAP go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=EAIM&sw=w&u=glasuni&v=2.1&id=GALE%7CA237197886&it=r&asid=7996c4e6b8112f130a9e41503e34c855 [Accessed 28/04/17].
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF). (2006). The inaugural session of the United Nations Internet Governance Forum 2016. Available at:
http:/wwww.intgovforum.org/summary.final.07.11.2006.htm [Accessed 29/04/17].
Thelwall, M. (2008) Fk yea I swear: Cursing and gender in MySpace. Corpora, 3: 83-107.
Verhulst, S. G. (2010). The regulation of digital content. In: Lievrouw, L. A. and Livingstone, S. (eds.) Handbook of new media. London: Sage, pp. 329-349.
Widiartanto, Y. H. (2017). The government of Indonesia just blocked the access to Telegram. Kompas, 14th July. Available at: http://tekno.kompas.com/read/2017/07/14/16443017/layanan-chat-telegram-diblokir-di-indonesia [Accessed 14/07/2017].
World Economic Forum. (2013). Norms and values in digital media: Shaping solutions for a new era. World Economic Forum: Geneva.
Wu, I. (2008). Who regulates phones, television, and the internet? What makes a communications regulator independent and Why it matters. Perspective on Politics, 6(4): 769-783.
YouTube. (2016). YouTube advertising policies. Available at:
https://support.google.com/YouTube/answer/154235?hl=en [Accessed 17/04/2017].
YouTube. (2017a). YouTube Statistics. Available at: https://www.YouTube.com/yt/press/en-GB/statistics.html [Accessed 15/03/2017].
YouTube. (2017b). YouTube community guidelines. Available at:
https://www.YouTube.com/yt/policyandsafety/communityguidelines.html [Accessed 15/03/2017].
Copyright (c) 2021 Maya Rachmawaty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).