Understanding Teachers' Pedagogical Knowledge In ESL Vocabulary Teaching
Keywords:teaching of vocabulary, communicative language teaching, ESL
AbstractIn communicative language teaching classrooms, one of the main emphases is on students’ ability to use the target language for real life purposes. To achieve this goal, teachers may have to ensure that students have adequate vocabulary to express their feelings and ideas. Previous research on vocabulary teaching and learning tends to be quantitative in nature focusing on testing the effectiveness of some techniques. This research study however, is an attempt to understand teachers’ pedagogical systems that influence their practice in actual classroom interactions during vocabulary teaching and learning. In-depth interviews and classroom observations with two experienced Malaysian ESL teachers were conducted. The interviews highlighted the teachers’ beliefs as well as challenges they faced with regards to vocabulary teaching and learning. The classroom observations revealed that their practice was very much a reflection of their own beliefs, based on their own experience as students as well as teachers. The results of this study showcased the fact that teachers operate within the spectrum of their pedagogical knowledge.
Breen, M.P. & Candlin, C.N. (2001). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. In D.R. Hall & A. Hewings (Eds.), Innovation in English language teaching (pp9-26). London: Routledge.
Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S.R. (1998). Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Borg, M. (2004). The apprenticeship of observation. ELT Journal, 58(3), 274-276.
Borg, S. (1998). Teachers’ pedagogical systems and grammar teaching: A qualitative study. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 9-38.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching Journal, 36, 81-109.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
Coxhead A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34 (2), 213-38.
Curriculum Specifications (2003). Curriculum Development Center, Ministry of Education. Kuala Lumpur.
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H. & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus-on-form. Systems, 30, 419-432.
File, K.E. & Adams, R. (2010). Should vocabulary instruction be integrated or isolated? TESOL Quarterly, 44 (2), 222-249.
Folse, K.S. (2004). Myths about teaching and learning second language vocabulary: What recent research says. TESL Reporter, 37(2), 1-13.
Hatch, E. & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Irvine-Niakaris, C. & Kiely, R. (2015). Reading comprehension in test preparation classes: An analysis of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 369-392.
Kiely, R. & Davis, M. (2010). From transmission to transformation: Teacher learning in English for speakers of other languages. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 277–295.
Khoii, R. & Sharififar, S. (2013). Memorization versus semantic mapping in L2 vocabulary acquisition. ELT Journal, 67(2), 199-209.
Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach. Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319-326.
Martinez, R. & Schmitt, N. (2012). A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 299-320.
Moskovsky, C., Guowu Jiang, Libert, A. & Seamus, F. (2015). Bottom-up or top-down: English as a foreign language vocabulary instruction for Chinese university students. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 256-277.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, P. (2005). Teaching vocabulary. Asian EFL Journal, 7(3), 47-54.
Nunan, D. & Lamb, C. (2001). Managing the learning process. In D.R. Hall & A. Hewing (Eds.), Innovation in English Language Teaching (pp27-45). London: Routledge.
Qing Ma (2014). A contextualised study of EFL learners’ vocabulary learning approaches: Framework, learner approach and degree of success. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 11(3), 1-156.
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363.
Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64, 913-951.
Schmitt, N. & Schmitt, D. (1995). Vocabulary notebooks: Theoretical underpinnings and practice suggestions. ELT Journal,49(2), 133–143.
Schuetze, U. (2015). Spacing techniques in second language vocabulary acquisition: Short-term gains vs long-term memory. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 28-42.
Sonbul, S. & Schmitt, N. (2010). Direct teaching of vocabulary after reading: Is it worth the effort? ELT Journal, 64(3), 253-260.
Sonbul, S.& Schmitt, N. (2013). Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning, 63(1), 121-159.
Xie, X. (2013). Vocabulary explanation in English-major university classrooms in China. ELT Journal, 67(4), 435-445.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).