Are Realistic Or Are Abstract Visual Representations More Effective Tools In Technology-Based Geosciences Education?

Authors

  • Jolin Adeeb Qutub King Abdulaziz University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v7i1.1301

Abstract

In this study, the researchers developed two visual representations for use in the geosciences context. One of the study’s goals was to demonstrate the educational value of distinguishing realistic from abstract visual representations in order to explore which type of representation most improves students’ cognitive understanding and learning of science. Four 4th-grade students were observed and videotaped while interacting with the developed representations. The researchers used the results to develop recommendations regarding useful pedagogical imagery.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-30

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018): January

Section

Article

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).